Özet:

In the article, the interaction between Mu'tezile and Ibn Sina's sophisticated claims is examined. The attitude of Aristotle, Farabi, Ibn Sina and some Mu'tezili speakers to the sofists is discussed by comparative analysis. In response to the claims of the sophisticists, Aristotle and Farabi are different from the method they follow, and they are criticized. The assumption of the article is that the preference of Ibn Sina in the criticism of Aristotle and Farabi was formed under the influence of some Muthesian scientists. In this case, it is assumed that Ka’bî is in the front. The article first identified the methodological criticism of Ibn Sina’s departure from Aristotle and Farabi and both of them. After that, there was a change in the form of the Qur’an, which was revealed. Ibn Sina’s principle and methodological attitude against the sophistic claims separated from Aristotle and Fārābī and the article that addressed the influence of Ka’bî as an assumption in this separation, comparative and content analysis, revealed that Ibn Sina’s conceptual and content aspects, such as Msterchid and Tenbih, were influenced by Ka’bî. Basing the assumption in the article is a very original point in terms of philosophy and vocal thinking traditions. In this context, it is intended to be a study that will contribute to literature and philosophy in which the article is original in terms of its subject, assumptions and results.

Anahtar Kelimeler: