Özet:

The settlements in Anadolu contain different architecture and settlements that best reflect the characteristics of the geography and climate in which they are located. The settlement character revealed by local differences varies from region to region, even in rural areas within the same region. These differences that make it possible to distinguish settlements attract attention with local architectural identity characteristics. Some of the rural settlements in Anatolia are established in unsuitable settlements or natural disasters that occur over time (cremes, floods, land shifts, etc.). They were injured and at risk of disappearance. For this reason, in the first years of the Republic, it has been scheduled to change/move the villages in order to improve the conditions of living and service, and in order to ensure that the inhabitants can continue to live in safer areas. As an example of the place-changing settlements in this study, the Kesmez village connected to the Konya Karapınar district, the old and new settlements, analyzed by comparison in the example, the equations and differences of a re-planned village with the old settlements, the natural environment and the socio-cultural components are assessed. The subject of the study is based on the analysis of the factors affecting physical formation. After all; the old Cutless village settlements and houses and the new Cutless village settlements and houses have been determined to cause differences in natural and socio-cultural factors. The transition from unplanned natural areas to planned and regular settlements and the architectural equations and differences that are formed as a result of this transition are demonstrated through the example of village settlements that change the place.

Özet:

The settlements in Anatolia involve different architectural and settlement examples that best reflect the characteristics of the geography and climate in which they are located. The settlement character of regional differences varies from region to region, even in rural areas within the same region. The differences that distinguish the settlements are remarkable with their local architectural identity features. Some of the rural settlements in Anatolia have been established in areas that are not convenient for settlement, or have been damaged by natural disasters (earthquakes, floods, landslides, etc.) over time, and have faced extinction. For this reason, in the first years of the Republic period, relocating/moving the villages in order to improve the living conditions, to provide service, and to enable the residents to continue to live in safer areas was brought to agenda. In this study, as an example of shifted settlements, Kesmez village of Karapınar district of Konya was analysed by comparison between old and new settlements, and the similarities and differences of a re-structured village with the old settlement were evaluated in terms of natural environment and socio-cultural components. The research topic is based on the analysis of the factors affecting physical shaping. As a result, it was determined that natural and socio-cultural factors cause differences in the old Kesmez village areas and houses and the new Kesmez village areas and houses. The transition from unplanned natural areas to planned and regular settlements and the architectural similarities and differences that have emerged because of this transition have been revealed through the example of the changing village settlement.

Anahtar Kelimeler: