Özet:

The narrative of the translations prepared the ground for the birth of intertext and comparative literary science. Intertext and comparative literature can also be practiced on the works of different nations, as it will be applied to the texts of the same culture. In fact, there are no writers who are influenced and quoted in different times and places. This generates similarities and differences between texts. Similarities and differences result in comparison necessary texts. It covers a very wide area. For comparison can be done both in terms of shape and mouth. But the possibility of all these detections is primarily related to the equipment of the reader and the researcher. It is a behavior that exists in the human nature. This behavior was later translated into literature and began to be used as a comparative literary method. Although this method has been used in Western literature for a long time, it has appeared in Turkish literature in the last century. In Turkey, this furia began through Leo Spitzer and Erich Auerbach in the years of advance has made a significant way with valuable names such as Cevdet Perin and Perci Enginün, especially recently Kubilay Aktulum has done many studies on this topic. Intertext and comparative literature are two terms that are still used in the last period of Turkish literature. In this study, the relationship between the Bulbul poem and the Bulbul mazmunus frequently used in classical literature, which Mehmet Akif Ersoy wrote on the Greek occupation of Bursa, which we call the country and the nation poet, was subject to an assessment in the context of intertext and comparative literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler: