Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 71
 İndirme 24
EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF TURKISH EQUITY UMBRELLA FUNDS USING THE MORNINGSTAR RATING SYSTEM
2018
Dergi:  
Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting
Yazar:  
Özet:

Purpose - Different types of funds exist depending on the assets the portfolio is composed of. The main types of funds include bond umbrella funds, equity umbrella funds, precious metal umbrella fund, fund basket umbrella funds, money market umbrella funds, participation umbrella fund, balanced umbrella funds, free umbrella funds, guaranteed umbrella fund, umbrella fund for protection purposes.The subject of our study is equity umbrella funds. These kinds of funds receive at least 80% of the share of investment by domestic and/foreign issuers. Purpose of this study is evaluating the performance of 57 Turkish equity umbrella funds which operate continuously between January 2012-December 2016 by using Morningstar rating system. Methodology - The Morningstar (star) rating system, which has proven to be an effective system for ranking mutual funds, has become the focus of both academic work and applications. This system, developed by Morningstar, ranks the performance results of mutual funds by assigning them 1 to 5 stars according to their adjusted risks. Findings - The results of the study reveal a lack of effective management of the equity umbrella funds, and that they perform below Treasury bond yields. The mutual funds, consequently, showed overall negative Morningstar performance results. It was determined that while foreign equity weighted mutual funds are more successful, mutual funds that invest in equity in the index are not quite successful. Conclusion- The study used the Morningstar rating system to evaluate 57 equity umbrella funds operating in Turkey between the periods of January 2012 and December 2016. The results obtained in the study regarding performance rankings and performance are not meant as a prediction of the future performance of the concerned funds, they are only intended to assess the value of the equity umbrella funds at a specific period in the past using an internationally accepted rating system.  The data obtained indicated that the equity umbrella funds have an overall negative Morningstar performance.   The equity umbrella funds are considered to be underperforming since they performed poorly compared to the Treasury bills used in the study. Under the assumption that past performance results will continue in the future, it is thought that the results are meaningful and should be followed. 

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler








Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting

Alan :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 380
Atıf : 566
Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting