Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 7
 Görüntüleme 82
 İndirme 34
Guncel Fen Ogretim Programlari ve Ders Kitaplarinda Model ve Modelleme Kavramlarinin Analizi
2019
Dergi:  
Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi
Yazar:  
Özet:

Model and modeling concepts are commonly used by both scientists and teachers, and these concepts are placed at the core of scientific processes. Therefore, it is important to determine and understand how the concepts of model and modeling are included in science curriculum and textbooks. So, the aim of this research was to examine the situation of these concepts in recently administered 2017 science curricula and textbooks in Turkey. For this purpose, the qualitative research design was chosen, and the data were collected and analyzed through document and content analyses methods. As the source of data; 2017 Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Geography and Science Education curricula and their 2017-2018 academic year science textbooks were used and systematically analyzed by using content analysis method. The results showed that the concepts are stated and mentioned in the curriculum, but explanation of scientific models and the role of these models in scientific progress are not mentioned. It was found that 6.9 % of the 2017 Science Education curriculum (Grades 5-8) and 7.5 % of the 2017 secondary education science curricula (Grades 9-12) standards are related to these concepts only. Nonetheless, when scientific process skills are taken into consideration, it is observed that modeling activities are generally directed to physical and scaled models, while the other types of models, such as theoretical, conceptual and mathematical models were not addressed. Overall, the new 2017 science curricula and their textbooks’ program gains have been found insufficient in terms of model and modeling concepts.    

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Analysis Of The Concepts Of Modeling and Modeling In Current Science Teaching Programs and Curricula Books
2019
Yazar:  
Özet:

Model and modeling concepts are commonly used by both scientists and teachers, and these concepts are placed at the core of scientific processes. Therefore, it is important to determine and understand how the concepts of modeling and modeling are included in the science curriculum and textbooks. So, the aim of this research was to examine the situation of these concepts in recently administered 2017 science curricula and textbooks in Turkey. For this purpose, the qualitative research design was chosen, and the data were collected and analyzed through document and content analysis methods. As the source of data; 2017 Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Geography and Science Education curricula and their 2017-2018 academic year science textbooks were used and systematically analyzed by using content analysis method. The results showed that the concepts are stated and mentioned in the curriculum, but the explanation of scientific models and the role of these models in scientific progress are not mentioned. It was found that 6.9% of the 2017 Science Education curriculum (Grades 5-8) and 7.5% of the 2017 secondary education science curricula (Grades 9-12) standards are related to these concepts only. However, when scientific process skills are taken into consideration, it is observed that modeling activities are generally directed to physical and scaled models, while the other types of models, such as theoretical, conceptual and mathematical models were not addressed. Overall, the new 2017 science curricula and their textbooks' program gains have been found insufficient in terms of modeling and modeling concepts.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler












Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi

Alan :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 577
Atıf : 3.145
2023 Impact/Etki : 0.497
Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi