Özet:

The aim of the study is to study the relationship between judges' problem-solving skills and their self-capacities along with some demographic variables. Work is a visual work in the relational scan model. The sample of the study is created using the appropriate sample method. The study was attended by a group of 242 judges, including 50% (n:122) football, 26% (n:62) basketball and 24% (n:58) huntball judges who were active in the 2017-2018 season. 16,5% of the group of judges participating in the study are women (n:40) and 83.5% (n:202) are male judges. The study used the personal information form as a tool for data collection, the problem-solving inventory developed by Hepler and Peterson (1982) and the arbitrator self-qualification scale developed by Karaçam and Pulur (2017a). For the determination of variable relationships, the Pearson Moment Relationship Correlation Assessment, the t test in bilateral comparisons and the one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) in multiple comparisons were used. In the analyses made, it has been shown that there is a significant difference between the total score of their judges and the level of education in favor of the graduate judges (p < .05). The total score of the judges, the physical skill, the knowledge of the game and the sub-dimensions of the pressure and the branches of the arbitration have found significant differences. Their judges have seen a negative and meaningful relationship between their total score and age and years of judgment (p < .05). Their judges have been shown to have a positive and meaningful relationship between their overall score, physical skill, game knowledge, decision-making, pressure and communication points and age and judgment years (p < .05). The judges are seen to have a negative and meaningful relationship with the total score of the judges with the total score of the judges with the physical skill, game knowledge, decision making, pressure and communication variables (p < .05). The study has shown that the skills of the judges to solve problems have significant variations in education, age and arbitration years, and in their own qualifications the age and arbitration years. It has also been shown that judges’ ability to solve problems and their self-capacities have a positive impact on each other.