Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 54
 İndirme 25
İlköğretim Okullarının Performans Düzeylerini Belirlemede Bir Yöntem ve Uygulama: İç Verimlilik Analizi
2010
Dergi:  
Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Yazar:  
Özet:

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'deki ilköğretim okullarının performansı, eğitimsel iç verimlilik kavramı çerçevesinde incelenmiştir. İç verimlik analizleri, 7 coğrafi bölge için gerçekleştirilmiş ve cinsiyet bazında karşılaştırmalar yapılmıştır. 2006 ve 2007 yıllarında resmi ilköğretim okullarına ait veriler kullanılarak, Türkiye'nin ilköğretim kademesindeki iç verimlilik düzeyi tahmininde bulunulmuştur. İç verimlilik hesaplamaları Tekrar-oluşturulmuş Grup Yöntemi kullanılarak yapılmış ve iç verimlilik katsayıları elde edilmiştir. Bölgeler bazında Türkiye genelinde iç verimlilik düzeyiyüksek bölge Karadeniz Bölgesi olduğu görülmüştür. Cinsiyet bazında da yine Karadeniz bölgesi iç verimlilik düzeyiyüksek bölge olmuştur. Doğu Anadolu ve Güneydoğu Anadolu bölgelerinin iç verimliliği, Türkiye ortalamasının altındadır. Kız öğrenciler bazında Güneydoğu Anadolu bölgesi erkek öğrencilerde ise Doğu Anadolu bölgesi iç verimlilik düzeyidüşük bölge olduğu görülmüştür. Anahtar Sözcükler: ilköğretim okulları, Tekrar-Oluşturulmuş Grup Yöntemi, iç verimlilik, performans A Method and an Application for Determining Performance Level of Primary Schools in Turkey: Internal Efficiency Analyze In this paper, we examined the performance level of primary schools in Turkey in the scope of educational internal efficiency. Analysis of internal efficiency was conducted for seven geographical regions and compared in terms of gender. Data regarding public primary schools in 2006 and 2007 was used to determine the internal efficiency level of primary schools. Assessment of internal efficiency was performed by using Reconstructed Cohort Method. By using this method, coefficients of internal efficiency were calculated. Findings of this research showed that Blacksea region had the highest internal efficiency coefficient in seven regions. In terms of gender, Blacksea region also had the highest internal efficiency coefficient. Eastern Anatolia and South-Eastern Anatolia regions had the fewer internal efficiency coefficient than the overall internal efficiency coefficient of Turkey. South-Eastern Anatolia region had the lowest internal efficiency coefficient for female students and Eastern Anatolia had the lowest internal efficiency coefficient for male student Keywords: primary schools, Reconstructed Cohort Method, internal efficiency, performance

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler




5. Education in the South Eastern Anatolia Region: Challenges and Opportunities Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi Dergi ana sayfası Amaç ve Kapsam / Aim & Scope Yazım Kuralları / Author Guidelines Arşiv / Archive Editör Kurulu / Editorial Board İletişim / Contact Gönderim Kuralları / Submission Guideline Dizinler Telif / Copyright Açık Erişim / Open Access Policy Yayın Ücreti / Publication Fees Short Communication - (2023) Volume 13, Issue 3 View PDF Download PDF Education in the South Eastern Anatolia Region: Challenges and Opportunities Haruki Kei*   *Correspondence: Haruki Kei, Department of Educational Sciences, Waseda University, Japan, Author info » Introduction The South Eastern Anatolia region of Turkey is a land of rich cultural heritage and historical significance. Despite its immense potential, the region has faced various challenges, including those related to education. In this article, we will explore the state of education in the South Eastern Anatolia region, the hurdles it faces, and the opportunities for improvement. The South Eastern Anatolia region, often referred to as “Güneydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi” in Turkish, encompasses a diverse mix of ethnicities, languages, and traditions. It has been a melting pot of civilizations for centuries. However, its educational landscape has not always kept pace with the rest of the country. Description One of the most significant challenges in the South Eastern Anatolia region is the high level of socioeconomic disparities. Poverty rates are relatively high, making it difficult for many families to access quality education. This economic inequality directly impacts children’s ability to access educational resources and succeed academically. In some areas of the region, there is a shortage of schools, classrooms, and basic educational infrastructure. This results in overcrowded classrooms, limited access to technology, and a less-than-optimal learning environment for students. Recruiting and retaining qualified teachers has been a persistent issue. Many experienced educators prefer to work in more developed regions, leaving schools in the South Eastern Anatolia region with less-experienced staff. This can impact the quality of education provided to students. The region is home to a variety of languages, including Kurdish and Arabic. Language barriers can hinder the educational process, as Turkish is the primary language of instruction in schools. This can lead to disconnect between what is taught in schools and the students’ native languages and cultures. Ongoing security concerns, particularly in some rural areas of the region, have disrupted the education system. Instances of school closures and students being unable to attend classes due to safety concerns have been reported. While there are certainly challenges in the South Eastern Anatolia region’s education system, there are also promising opportunities for improvement. The government can focus on building and upgrading schools, providing essential facilities, and ensuring access to a safe and conducive learning environment. This would require significant investment but would have a lasting impact on the region’s education system. Encouraging teachers to work in the South Eastern Anatolia region through incentives such as financial rewards, professional development opportunities, and improved working conditions can help address the teacher shortage issue [1-4]. Conclusion Recognizing and embracing the linguistic diversity of the region can be beneficial. Bilingual education programs that incorporate local languages and cultures into the curriculum can help bridge the language gap and create a more inclusive educational environment. Engaging the local community in the education system can foster a sense of ownership and accountability. Parent-teacher associations, community-driven initiatives, and partnerships with local organizations can play a vital role in supporting education in the region. Resolving ongoing security concerns is essential for the region’s development. Peace and stability would enable schools to operate without interruption and ensure that students can attend classes safely. Education in the South Eastern Anatolia region faces significant challenges, but there is hope for improvement. Acknowledgement None. Conflict Of Interest None. References D.R. Bridges, R.A. Davidson, P.S. Odegard, I.V. Maki, J. Tomkowiak, Interprofessional collaboration: Three best practice models of interprofessional education, Med Educ Online, 8(2011):16. [Crossref] [Google Scholar] M.L. Barbosa, L.L.M. Atanasio, S.G. Medeiros, C.O.P.O. Saraiva, V.E.P. Santos, Evolution of nursing teaching in the use of education technology: A scoping review, Rev Bras Enferm, 74(2021):20200422. [Crossref] [Google Scholar] C. Holdsworth, E.H. Skinner, C.M. Delany, Using simulation pedagogy to teach clinical education skills: A randomized trial, Physiother Theory Pract, 32(2016):284-95. [Crossref] [Google Scholar] B. Alberts, Prioritizing science education, Science, 328(2010):405. [Crossref] [Google Scholar] Author Info Haruki Kei*   Department of Educational Sciences, Waseda University, Japan   Received: 30-Aug-2023, Manuscript No. JESR-23-117286; , Pre QC No. JESR-23-117286(PQ); Editor assigned: 01-Sep-2023, Pre QC No. JESR-23-117286(PQ); Reviewed: 15-Sep-2023, QC No. JESR-23-117286; Revised: 20-Sep-2023, Manuscript No. JESR-23-117286(R); Published: 27-Sep-2023, DOI: 10.22521/JESR.2023.13.3.22 Copyright:This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Online Paper Submission»
2023


Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Alan :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 396
Atıf : 1.339
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Atıf Dizini