Some researches which have been done on the teaching of religious traditions in high schools have demonstrated that students are very eager and keen on learning other religions. However these studies put forward two other conclusions: The first one is that students of Imam‐Hatip and other schools have not got enough information of non‐Islamic religions. And their information of other religions have been obtained not from schools but other sources. In this article, taking off from the conclusions of the statistical studies which were carried out concerning teaching other religions, first of all it is dealt with the problems concerning the course called “Comparative History of Religions” which argued that it was prepared in the light of pluralistic worldview. Secondly it is set forth some suggestions concerning those problems. By doing this it is also tried to answer the following questions: Why students of Imam Hatip Schools do not have enough information about other religions although most of them are eager to have information about other religions? What are the main problems concerning the course “Comparative History of Religions” which is given in Imam‐Hatip Schools? What kind of solutions can be suggested concerning Comparative History of Religion course both theoretically anf practically?
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|