Özet:

The concept of intertext is derived from Bakhtin's conversational thought. According to Bakhtin, every meaning is filled with a response and the person who speaks is never the first person to talk about the topic he talks about. This approach suggests that every judgment we present about the world is open and that every claim is discouraging by its nature. Kristeva welcomes Bakhtin's speech concept, depending on his text-centered approach, but ignoring the emphasis on historicity, with the concept of intertextity. From Christina’s point of view, every text is a quote of Mozai. As a result of this situation, the meaning of the text is an open end meaning that is transferred from other texts to itself. From the point of view of the film, this concept is very favorable from the theoretical reading point. Indeed, every film is full of submissions to other films and acquires its own value from the submissions to the heritage of the cinema. As a film that affects the course of the cinema in many ways, Matrix has this approach in many ways. It includes many philosophical transmissions from Baudrillard’s superior reality thought to Platon’s Cave Alegory, from Cartezyan thought to contemporary approach to neurophilosophy. In this study, we will try to consider some of the thought field behind the Matrix by evaluating Matrix within the theoretical framework of intertextism in the context of Hegel's master's slave dialectic and unhappy consciousness concepts.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Anahtar Kelimeler: