Özet:

The Lozan Treaty, after the First World War, is not similar to the peace treaties forced by the victorious countries of the war. In fact, after the First World War, the collapse of the existing coalition of the opposition states with the Soviet Russia, which is also in its allied position, and the victories in the military field of the popular struggle that began under the leadership of Atatürk in the National Struggle period have contributed successes to Turkish foreign policy. Thus, instead of the Sevres Treaty, which was forced to accept the Ottoman State, the Turkish State, which successfully came from the National Struggle, made it possible to recognize its independence by signing the Lozan Treaty in equal terms with the victories of the First World War. Among the countries that were defeated in the First World War, only Turkey was allowed to make such a treaty. This study aims to identify how the Golgotha issue, which was discussed in the Lozan Conference talks and considered an international political issue, is the scene of discussions between Britain, Soviet Russia and Turkey within the framework of three opinions, and how the Russian ambassador, who was unwanted to be attended to the Lozan talks, was killed. In this context, the parliamentary speeches on the subject from the British Chamber of Deputies are transmitted, along with the news in the national press with the method of document screening, the process with the information obtained through the basic works on the subject in the field. During the talks, Turkey, which defended the clarity of the Gulf and was close to its allied opinions, agreed that the Gulf would not be arbitrated and some guarantees were given in return for the free passage of the war vessels from the Gulf. The study contains an originality separated from similarities in the area in the summer by describing how both the British and Turkish parliament and national press are acting on a particular issue of the Lozan Conference.

Anahtar Kelimeler: