Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 1
 Görüntüleme 2
 İndirme 5
Servikal Smear ve Biyopsi Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması
2020
Dergi:  
Journal of Contemporary Medicine
Yazar:  
Özet:

Aim: While cervical cancer was at the forefront of female genital cancers until the early 20th century, incidence and death from cervical cancer decreased by 50% due to the spread of cervical cancer screening after the 1950s. Infection with human papilloma virus is the most important factor in the development of cervical cancer. Cervical smear screening is an important method used for early diagnosis of cervical cancer and precursor lesions, especially in developed countries. Materials and Methods: The results of 223 patients who were examined and reported in the Medical Pathology Laboratory of the Selcuk University Medical Faculty Hospital between 2010-2018, who had a smear result before and who underwent cervical biopsy were compared. Results: The average age of 223 patients was 45 (26-83). Biopsy results: Chronic inflammation in 173 (78%) patients, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in 15 (7%) patients “HPV or mild dysplasia or CIN 1, high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in 21 (9%) patients“ Moderate dysplasia or severe dysplasia or CIN 2 or CIN 3 or Carcinoma has been reported in situ and in 14 (6%) patients as malignant / squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusion: When the biopsy and smear results were evaluated together, it was observed that the results of biopsy and smears were compatible in 141 (63%) patients, and the results of biopsy and smears were different in 82 (37%) patients. Ease of application and low cost of Pap smear test has made this method widely used. False negative results can be seen due to technical reasons and evaluation errors. In our series, a correlation was found in 63% of cases. Although false negative rates with Pap smear range from 1.1% to 50%, this test is still considered the most effective method for detecting precancerous lesions.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Comparison Of Servial Smear and Biopsy Results
2020
Yazar:  
Özet:

Aim: While cervical cancer was at the forefront of female genital cancers until the early 20th century, incidence and death from cervical cancer decreased by 50% due to the spread of cervical cancer screening after the 1950s. Infection with human papilloma virus is the most important factor in the development of cervical cancer. Cervical smear screening is an important method used for early diagnosis of cervical cancer and precursor lesions, especially in developed countries. Materials and Methods: The results of 223 patients who were examined and in the Medical Pathology Laboratory of the Selcuk University Medical Faculty Hospital between 2010-2018, who had a smear result before and who underwent cervical biopsy were compared. Results: The average age of 223 patients was 45 (26-83). Biopsy results: Chronic inflammation in 173 (78%) patients, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in 15 (7%) patients "HPV or mild dysplasia or CIN 1, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in 21 (9%) patients" Moderate dysplasia or level dysplasia or CIN 2 or CIN 3 or Carcinoma has been in situ and in 14 (6%) patients as malignant / squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusion: When the biopsy and smear results were evaluated together, it was observed that the results of biopsy and smears were compatible in 141 (63%) patients, and the results of biopsy and smears were different in 82 (37%) patients. Ease of application and low cost of Pap smear test has made this method widely used. False negative results can be seen due to technical reasons and evaluation errors. In our series, a correlation was found in 63% of cases. Although false negative rates with Pap smear range from 1.1% to 50%, this test is still considered the most effective method for detecting precancerous lesions.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler








Journal of Contemporary Medicine

Alan :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 1.253
Atıf : 1.263
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Atıf Dizini