Özet:

In Turkey, social-economic differences in society in recent periods have been concrete and visualized through residential sites that are increasingly spread, especially in the province of Istanbul. How does the population mobility created by the sites that find the number of housing owners tens of thousands affect the results of the election? This study, which aims to understand the impact of closed housing on the election results of the region in which they are in the past few years in urban areas, fills the gap in literature by evaluating their voting behavior in terms of the space-reliance relationship. This study, which examines the localized residential sites in the Istanbul Tuzla district, the theory of voting the population mobility and the reflection of the election results, has shown that there are large differences in the choice of voting living within the same geographical classes with voters with a particular economic level, with a particular social status, but on the other side of the wall, the area where the collective residential buildings are made has an impact on the 2018 general and 2019 local election results. In the after-site elections, the votes of the AK Party declined significantly, yet a certain portion of the scratched votes were held within the Republican Alliance. According to the average in Turkey, there is a significant increase in votes from the site voters to the opposition bloc of the National Alliance. When the number of voters after the site is assessed, the number of votes of the central-right and central-left parties is increased, while the party that receives the most share of the new votes is the GOOD Party.

Anahtar Kelimeler: