Views
24
Downloands
1
Kürek sporu rüzgar, yağmur ve soğuk gibi çevresel faktörlerden etkilenen bir spor branşı olmasından dolayı kürek ergometresi ile yapılan simule antrenmanların iç ve dış yüklerinin takibi önem kazanmaktadır. Bu araştırmanın amacı kürekçilerde 2000m ergometre ve gerçek su performanslarının iç ve dış yüklerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Bu çalışmaya 12 erkek kürekçi gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Sporcuların 2000m ergometre ve suda kürek performansları 48 saat arayla 2 test gününde ölçüldü. Sporcuların test süresi (dk), kan laktat birikimi (mmoL-1), algılanan zorluk derecesi (sAZD), maksimum kalp atış hızı yüzdesi (%KAHmaks) ve ortalama kalp atış hızı (ortalama KAH/dk) her iki deneme gününde de ayrı ayrı kaydedildi. Verilerin normallik sınaması için Shapiro-Wilks testi, normal dağılım göstermeyen verilerin karşılaştırılmasında ise Wilcoxon Signed-Rank testi kullanıldı. Kürekçilerin 2000m ergometre ve gerçek su performansları karşılaştırıldığında; bitirme süresi (χ2=-3.059; p=.002), laktat birikim miktarı (χ2=-3.077; p=.002), algılanan zorluk derecesi (χ2=-3.059; p=.002), maksimum kalp atım yüzdesi (χ2=-3.061; p=.002) ve ortalama kalp atım hızı (χ2=-3.084; p=.002) değişkenleri arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı farklılık olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, 2000m gerçek su performansının kürek ergometresi performansına oranla daha yüksek iç ve dış yük değerlerine sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Dolayısıyla antrenör ve sporculara kürek ergometresindeki simule antrenman yüklerini gerçek su performansına eşdeğer yüklere göre düzenlemeleri önerilmektedir.
As a sport industry affected by environmental factors such as wind, rain and cold, the tracking of the internal and external burden of the simulation exercises performed with the ergometry of the curve is important. The aim of this study is to compare the internal and external burden of the 2000m ergometers and the real water performance in curls. There were 12 volunteers who participated in this study. Athletes’ 2000m ergometre and water curve performance were measured in 2 test days between 48 hours. Athletes' test time (d), blood laktate accumulation (mmoL-1), detected difficulty degree (sAZD), maximum heart rate percentage (%KAHmax) and average heart rate (medium KAH/min) were recorded separately on both trial days. The Shapiro-Wilks test was used to test the normality of the data, while the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to compare the data that did not show normal distribution. When compared the 2000m ergometry and real water performance of the rocks, there was a statistically significant difference between the termination time (χ2=-3.059; p=.002), the amount of lactate accumulation (χ2=-3.077; p=.002), the detected difficulty degree (χ2=-3.059; p=.002), the maximum heart rate (χ2=-3.061; p=.002) and the average heart rate (χ2=-3.084; p=.002) variables. As a result, it is shown that the real water performance of 2000m has higher internal and external load values than the curve ergometry performance. Therefore, coaches and athletes are advised to adjust the simulated training loads in the curve ergometry according to the loads equivalent to the actual water performance.
Since rowing is a sports branch affected by environmental factors such as wind, rain, and cold, it becomes important to monitor the internal and external loads of simulated training made with rowing ergometers. This research aims to compare the internal and external loads of the 2000m ergometer and actual water performances in rowers. 12 male rowers voluntarily participated in this study. The 2000m ergometer and on-water rowing performances of the athletes were measured on 2 test days with an interval of 48 hours. Test duration (min), blood lactate accumulation (mmol/L-1), rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), percentage of maximum heart rate (%HRmax) and mean heart rate (meanHR/min) of the athletes were recorded on both trial days, seperately. The Shapiro-Wilks test was used to test the normality of the data, and the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test was used to compare the data that did not show normal distribution. Comparing the 2000m ergometer and actual water performances of rowers, the finishing time (χ2 =-3.059; p = .002) lactate accumulation level (χ2 =-3.077; p = .002), rating of perceived exertion (χ2 =-3.059; p =. 002), the maximum percentage of heart rate (χ2=-3.061; p = .002), and the mean heart rate (χ2 =-3.084; p = .002) were found to be statistically significant. As a result, it is seen that the actual water performance of 2000m has higher internal and external load values compared to the rowing ergometer performance. Therefore, it is recommended that trainers and athletes adjust their simulated training loads on the rowing ergometer according to loads equivalent to actual water performance.
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
