User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 51
 Downloands 15
Akademisyenlerin Eleştirel Düşünme Düzeyleri ile Örgütün Etik İklimine İlişkin Algıları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi
2020
Journal:  
Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Eleştirel düşünce akademik yaşamın en önemli özelliklerinden birisidir. Bu çalışma, spor bilimleri alanındaki akademisyenlerin eleştirel düşünme düzeyleri ile örgütün etik iklimine ilişkin algıları arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmaya Ege Bölgesi’nde bulunan Spor Bilimleri Fakültelerinde çalışan 130 akademisyen (39 kadın, 91 erkek) katılmıştır. Çalışmada, Kaliforniya Eleştirel Düşünme Eğilimleri Ölçeği (KEDEÖ), Etik İklim Ölçeği (EİÖ) ve kişisel bilgi formu kullanılmıştır. Akademisyenlerin orta düzeyde eleştirel düşünme düzeyine (𝑋̅= 241,58 Ss=.16,31) sahip oldukları ve çalıştıkları üniversitenin etik iklimine biraz katıldıkları (𝑋̅= 2.62 Ss=.46) görülmüştür. Akademisyenlerin eleştirel düşünce düzeyleri ile etik iklim (r=-,245), egoist iklim (r=-,299) ve ilkelilik iklimi (r= -,289) arasında negatif yönde anlamlı ilişkiler olduğu belirlenmiştir. Akademisyenlerin, eleştirel düşünme düzeylerini geliştirebilmesi önemlidir. Bununla beraber bilimsel üretim ve verimlilik için çalışma ortamında yaratılacak olan etik iklim vazgeçilmez bir rol oynar.

Keywords:

Review of the relationship between the critical thinking levels of academics and the perceptions of the organization's ethical climate
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

Critical thinking is one of the most important features of academic life. This study was aimed at determining the relationship between the critical thinking levels of academics in the field of sports sciences and the perceptions of the organization’s ethical climate. The study included 130 academics (39 women, 91 men) working at the Faculty of Sports Sciences in the Egean Region. The study used the California Critical Thought Trends Scale (CEDEA), the Ethical Climate Scale (CEDEA) and personal information forms. It has been shown that academics have a medium level of critical thinking (X=241,58; Ss=.16,31) and have a slight participation in the ethical climate of the university in which they work (X=2.62; Ss=46) It has been determined that critical thinking levels and the ethical climate (r=-245), the egoist climate (r=-299) and the primitive climate (r=-289) have a negative-significant relationship. It is important that academics are able to develop their critical thinking levels. However, the ethical climate that will be created in the work environment for scientific production and efficiency plays an indispensable role.

Keywords:

Investigation Of The Relationship Between Academicians' Critical Thinking Levels and Perceptions Of The Organization On Ethical Climate
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

Critical thinking is one of the most important features of academic life. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the critical thinking level of academicians in sports sciences research area and their perceptions about the ethical climate of the organization. The total of 130 academicians (39 females & 91 males) working in the Sports Sciences Faculty in the Aegean Region participated in the study. In this study, California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory, Ethical Climate Scale (SES) and a questionnaire form were used to collect data. It was determined that academicians had moderate critical thinking level (M= 241.58; Sd = .16.31) and they slightly involved in the ethical climate of the university (M= 2.62; Sd = .46). It was found that there was a negative relationship between the critical thinking levels of academicians and ethical climate (r = -, 245), egoist climate (r = -, 299) and primitive climate (r = -, 289). It is important for academics to improve their critical thinking levels. However, the ethical climate to be created in the working environment for scientific production and efficiency plays an indispensable role.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri; Filoloji; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.272
Cite : 13.228
Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi