Özet:

Fuat Sezgin. [18] In the book of Muhadarât fî Târîhi’l-Ulûmi’l-Arabiaye and ‘l-Islamiyye’ in the book ‘Isnadın Ehemmeti in Arab-Islam’ and in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘Bukhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ in the book ‘The Sources of Buhari’ 256/870) of the work named el-Câmiu's-Sahîh, especially the book of the interpretation of Ferrâ (cf. [27] And [27] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] and [28] 209/824) He claims that his work in the name of the Qur’an is a summary. Fuat Sezgin's this discovery is the basis of the thesis that it is based not only on healing sources, but also on written sources while creating the work of Buhari. In the work of Fuat Sezgin's Buhâri's Ma'mer B. The claim of al-Müsennâ’s work to make quotes will be extended and will be attempted to identify the incidence in the Hicri second-century Arabic works of the Hicri third-century Hicri Hicri. Thus, it will be attempted to determine whether the first source of the works in the Arabic language field, which have been written in the second century by movement from the Mescur claim, and how to use it. When this is done, the works in the Arabic field will first be studied in two main frameworks, Basra and Kufe. In addition, the general procedure for the use of the hadith in Arabic, the approach to the hadith and the subject of the hadith, the taricles and possible idols in which the rivayet is transmitted, will be addressed chronologically comparatively with the hadith works.

Özet:

Fuad Sezgin’s (d. 2018) article on “The Importance of Isnad in Arab-Islamic Science” and the book titled Buhari’nin Kaynakları claims that Muḥammad b. Ismāʿīl al-Bukhārī (d.256/870) -in the tafsīr book- summarizes Yaḥyā b. Ziyād alFarrā’s (d. 207/822) al-Maʿāni al-Qur’ân and Abū ʿUbayda Maʿmar b. al-Muthannā’s (d. 209/824) al-Macāz al-Qur’ān. The main idea of Fuad Sezgin is that al-Bukhārī did not only rely on oral sources but also on written sources when he created the al-Jāmi al-Ṣaḥīḥ. Therefore, Arabic Language Literature in the first three centuries has to be investigated and compared with al-Kutub al-Sitta to reach a final conclusion. In this article, the claims of Fuad Sezgin will be extended and discussed in this respect. In order to verify the authenticity of these claims, the ahadith and the chain system of the al-Baṣra and al-Kūfa Arabic Language books will be determined. If the aḥādīth given in these sources comes before the al-Kutub al-Sitta, this means that we can reach earlier sources about the ahādīth given in al-Kutub al-Sitta. In addition, the method of using the hadith in the these sources, the hadīth chains and the possible tariqs will be examined in a chronological and comparative way.

Anahtar Kelimeler: