Özet:

With the emergence of the Constitutional judiciary it was ensured that the legal norm regulated by the state organs were  reviewed for their compatibility with the constitutional principles. With the 1961 Constitution, the Constitutional Court was established and the court was given the authority to compliance audit. The Constitutional Court performs this compliance control in three ways; abstract review of norms, concrete review of norms and individual application. The basis of the study is consisted of concrete review of norms. The aim of this study is to analyze the decisions made as a result of the application of the courts within the scope of today’s jurisdiction to the Constitutional Court by using the concrete constitutionality review method and to show the decisions made for the judicial and administrative justice by comparing them. The data included in the study were obtained from the Constitutional Court as a result of concrete constitutionality review. In accordance with these data, it was determined that a total of 2.373 decisions were made for the courts in today’s jurisdiction. Considering the judicial dimension, it was seen that the highest number of judicial jurisdictions filed an objection. On the basis of the court, it was determined that criminal court of first instance applied the most. 

Anahtar Kelimeler: