User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 22
 Downloands 2
Assessment of the effect of different imaging techniques on planning implant therapy by different clinicians
2020
Journal:  
Annals of Medical Research
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: To compare the implant size which was determined by different observers using panoramic radiography (PAN) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with inserted implant size.Material and Methods: 194 PAN and CBCT images which belong to 194 patients who were planned to undergone single-tooth implant therapy were evaluated. 50 anterior regions, 42 premolar regions and 92 molar regions were assessed. These sites were used for planning of dental implant insertion. Images were analyzed by observers with different education and clinic experience backgrounds: one periodontist (observer 1), one oral and maxillofacial radiologist (observer 2), and one general practitioner (observer 3). Panoramic images and cross-sectional CBCT images of each patient were examined; differences in length and width of the implant-to-be from the two imaging systems were analyzed and compared to inserted implant size.Results: Observer 2 recorded the largest implant width whereas observer 3 recorded narrower implants in PAN. Observer 3 recorded shortest implants than did the other two observers in CBCT and observer 2 recorded narrower implants in CBCT. The CBCT measurements allowed a wider implant in the premolar and molar regions. No significant difference was observed between CBCT and PAN in planning the implant length. The inserted implant size was smaller than the measurements made in CBCT.Conclusion: The results show that; different observers present different values in determining implant length and width. The inserted implant size and the dimensions measured on CBCT and PAN images were different. Downloads Download data is not yet available. Article Details How to Cite Goller Bulut, D., & Ustaoglu, G. (2021). Assessment of the effect of different imaging techniques on planning implant therapy by different clinicians . Annals of Medical Research, 27(2), 0533–0537. Retrieved from https://annalsmedres.org/index.php/aomr/article/view/623 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Issue Volume 27 Issue 2 (2020): February Section Original Articles CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0

Keywords:

null
2020
Author:  
0
2020
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Annals of Medical Research

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 3.232
Cite : 323
Annals of Medical Research