User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 20
 Downloands 1
The Nutrient Values and Microbiological Quality Properties of Mixed Feeds Used in Ruminant Nutrition in Diyarbakir Province.
2008
Journal:  
Acta Veterinaria Eurasia
Author:  
Abstract:

The purpose of this study was to determine nutrient values, bacteria and fungus flora of 60 mixed feed samples obtained from Diyarbakir province. The nutrient values, bacteria and fungus flora of all feeds were analyzed by classical methods. In the mixed feeds of dairy cows, beef cattle, calf and lamb; dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, nitrogen free extract matter and crude ash differences among the feeds were not statistically significant (p>0.05). In this research, crude fiber levels have found higher than standard values in calf and lamb feeds. However, in the mixed dairy cows, calf and lamb feeds, crude protein values were lower than standard values. While the highest total mesophilic aerobe bacteria counts were found in lamb feeds, the lowest were in dairy cow feeds. The highest values of mould and yeast were determined in beef cattle feeds. Although Salmonella were not detected in beef cattle, calf and lamb feeds, in dairy cow feeds, they were found 13.33 %. The contamination rates were found as 13.33 %, 46.66 %, 33.33 %,13.33 % for Listeria monocytogenes; 93.33 %, 86.66 %, 93.33 %, 80.00 % for coliform bacteria; 40.00 %, 26.66 %, 20.00 %, 40.00 % for Escherichia coli; 86.66 %, 80.00 %, 93.33 %, 60.00 % for Staphylococcus spp.; 73.33 %, 73.33 %, 60.00 %, 46.66 % for sulfite reducing anaerobe bacteria; 100.00 %, 100.00 %, 86.66 %, 93.33 % for Bacillus cereus; 93.33 %, 80.00 %, 100.00 %, 86.66 % for mould and 80.00 %, 73.33 %, 100.00 % and 80.00 % for yeast in dairy cows, beef cattle, calf and lamb feeds, respectively. As a result, in the mixed feeds of dairy cows, calf and lamb used in ruminant nutrition in Diyarbakir province, both microbiological and nutrient quality were low, however in beef cattle feeds, only microbiological quality was low.

Keywords:

null
2008
Author:  
0
2008
Author:  
Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










Acta Veterinaria Eurasia

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 581
Cite : 237
Acta Veterinaria Eurasia