Özet:

Purpose- The purpose of this article is to present a model of transparency in economic, social, and cultural fields in order to create social justice and use the expert judgment of researchers, lawyers, and journalists to prevent corruption when the relevant institutions do not have effective supervision due to systematic corruption. One of the detrimental and irrefutable aspects of the growth and advancement of societies is corruption. A nation or group with the desire to end corruption needs to have a lot of fighting potential. In this regard, the professional judgment of academics, attorneys, and journalists can be based on open data in the form of a data ecosystem, which includes rules and regulations, the identities of decision makers, and data from numerous economic and social domains online. Professional judgment is a supervision tool that can be highly effective in thwarting and exposing the emergence and spread of systematic corruption in a variety of contexts. This procedure raises the likelihood that corruption will be found, prevents managers from ignoring their duties, and broadens the scope of their responsibilities. Methodology- In this article, the conceptual model, assumptions, and measurement indicators of the research variables are presented. Findings- Corruption flourish in countries where there is a lack of accountability, openness, and consistency, as well as institutional deficiencies in the legislative and judicial systems. Conclusion- Corruption increases the costs of the administrative, economic, and judicial systems and makes it impossible to achieve social justice. Access to open data and big data in various fields, as well as publishing them in the data life cycle with the judgment of researchers, lawyers, and journalists, is a practical and important method for discovering, preventing, and combating corruption. In fact, omissions and systematic corruption happen in areas where there is no supervisory presence.

Anahtar Kelimeler: