Özet:

Parables are among the most prominent of the styles and methods used by the Qur'an, the source of guidance, to guide people to the truth, the good, and the right. Therefore, the Qur'anic parables, which have been the subject of research in many aspects, should also be scrutinized in terms of jurisprudence. Because, although the issue of the evidence of shar'u men kablena (the shari'ah of the previous nations) being a valid argument is controversial in terms of jurisprudence, it is known that many jurisprudential rulings have been made in practice based on this evidence. Moreover, it is noteworthy that classical sources utilize these parables in the solution of many jurisprudential issues and that the fuqaha make ijtihad based on some of the usages in the parables. On the other hand, it is a fact that religion is one and shari'ahs vary. Therefore, determining the close relationship, similarities, and differences between the previous shari'ah and the last shari'ah provides the opportunity for comparison, as well as seeing the change in the shari'ah in the historical process and the reasons for it. For this reason, the jurisprudential analysis of the story of Prophet Noah (a.s), who is regarded as the first prophet with a shari'ah, is the subject of this study. In this parable, there are issues that are closely related to many jurisprudential issues such as the necessity of forgiveness in the prayer for rain (istiskâ), who the family members (ahl) consist of, the relationship between religious ties and kinship, marriage with a non-Muslim woman, and the protection of the generation of animals. Therefore, in this study, the parable of Prophet Noah (a.s) is discussed from a jurisprudential point of view and the shar'i judgments that are/can be deduced from this parable and the discussions, if any, related to them are tried to be put forward.

Anahtar Kelimeler: