User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 3
 Views 8
KARŞILIKLI GÜVEN İLKESİ İLE TEMEL HAKLARIN KORUNMASI ARASINDAKİ MAKUL DENGE ARAYIŞI: AVRUPA TUTUKLAMA MÜZEKKERESİ ÖRNEĞİ
2019
Journal:  
Marmara Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Karşılıklı güven ilkesi; özgürlük, güvenlik ve adalet alanının köşe taşı olarak kabul edilmekte olan karşılıklı tanıma ilkesine temel oluşturur. Karşılıklı güven ilkesi, esasen, Avrupa Birliği (AB) üyesi devletlerin, diğer üye devletlerin özellikle AB hukukunun tanıdığı temel haklara uyduğunu addetmelerini gerektirir. O halde, karşılıklı güven ilkesi aslında bir karinedir. Peki, bu ilke mutlak bir karine midir (i), yoksa çürütülebilir bir karine midir (ii)? Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı içtihat hukuku, tarihsel gelişim sürecine bakıldığında birinci durumdan ikinci duruma doğru evirilmiş gözükmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, karşılıklı tanıma ve dolayısıyla güven ilkesinin ilk kullanımı olan Avrupa Tutuklama Müzekkeresi örneği üzerinden, karşılıklı güven ilkesi ile ilgili bu dönüşümü, nedenleri ve sonuçları ile birlikte ortaya koymak, böylece bu dönüşümün tamamlanıp tamamlanmadığı başta olmak üzere, geleceğe dair de bazı çıkarımlar yapmaktır.

Keywords:

Search For A Reasonable Balance Between Principle Of Mutual Trust and Protection Of Fundamental Rights: European Arrest Warrant As An Example
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

Principle of mutual trust forms the basis of principle of mutual recognition which has been recognised as the cornerstone of the area of freedom, security and justice. Essentially, the principle of mutual trust requires that any European Union (EU) Member State should assume that other Member States observe especially the fundamental rights recognized by EU law. Hence, the principle of mutual trust is indeed a presumption. Then, does this principle establish an absolute presumption (i), or a rebuttable presumption (ii)? Considering the historical development process, the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union seem to have evolved from the first condition to the second condition. Via the example of European Arrest Warrant which is the first use of principle of mutual recognition and hence mutual trust, this Article aims to present this evolution regarding the principle of mutual trust in conjunction with its reasons and consequences, and to draw some conclusions regarding the future, particularly about whether this evolution has been over or not.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Marmara Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 441
Cite : 595
Marmara Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi