Özet:

This study examined the justice policies of the rulers of the Turkish Sultanate of Delhi from the Middle Ages Turkish-Islamic states. The attitude of the sultan in the face of injustice arising in matters that concern state, institution, society and individuals, lawsuits, demands and disputes, has been investigated in the light of the sources of the time. These reports reflect that even the smallest judicial developments have attracted the attention of the sultan. The sources that reveal that in the Sultan Kutbeddîn Aybek period one person cannot even touch another’s grass have given the justice system that should be. The journey of Ibn Battûta, which offers the clearest records of the understanding of justice of Sultan Shemseddîn Il-Tutmuş, has offered another aspect of the judicial policies applied by his transfers. He made those who thought they were wrong in society in any way to wear colourful clothes. Then he turned to the door of the palace, throwing the bell to the door of the palace, thinking that the people would be killed at night. It has shown the image of a ruler trying to ensure justice in time and place. Here it is seen that a system of justice is presented through the image of Halife Omar, which is often seen in the narrative of both Turkish and Islamic history. In addition, the search for the right of Sultan Raziye Begüm, who revealed an unreliable struggle, was another topic discussed in the work. The attitude of the Sultan Nâsireddîn, who acted in the awareness that the Treasury is the right of the whole society and, despite being a sultan, did not find it appropriate to touch there to meet the needs of his wife, was one of the issues processed. The ruling of Sultan Celâleddin, who judges the leaders of the alleged opposition movement against the state and the throne in an open court, is remarkable. The activities of Sultan Alâeddîn, which established balance and control so that the society should not be sacrificed during the purchase, have also found a place in the work.