User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 10
 Downloands 2
Effect of Surfactants on Response of Promethazine PVC-Membranes
2006
Journal:  
Turkish Journal of Chemistry
Author:  
Abstract:

The effect of surfactants (cationic, anionic and non-ionic) on the performance of plastic membrane promethazine electrodes was studied. Three electrodes with membranes containing either sodium tetraphenylborate, sodium tetraphenylborate + 18-crown-6, or 18-crown-6 were prepared. The cationic and the anionic surfactants exhibited potential shifts and a super-Nernstian slope of the calibration graphs. The non-ionic surfactant did not cause alterations in the calibration graphs. The effect of surfactants' concentrations was investigated. The performance characteristics of these electrodes were studied. The slopes of the calibration graphs of the 3 electrodes were 54.4, 54.9 and 48.4 mV/decade. The rectilinear ranges were 2 x 10-5-10-2, 1.0 x 10-5-10-2 and 3.2 x 10-5-10-2 M corresponding to the 3 electrodes. The optimum pH range was 2-7. The selectivity coefficient values were calculated for different inorganic cations, amino acids and pharmaceutical amines. Direct potentiometry and potentiometric titration were applied for the determination of promethazine in its pure form or in its pharmaceutical preparation. The recovery range and the relative standard deviation values for potentiometric titration were 98.6%-100.1% and 0.79%-1.96% (4 determinations), respectively. For direct potentiometry, the corresponding recovery values were 98.6% and 99.5%, and the relative standard deviation values were 1.49% and 1.02% (4 determinations).

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Turkish Journal of Chemistry

Field :   Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 2.410
Cite : 1.692
2023 Impact : 0.068
Turkish Journal of Chemistry