Abstract:

Purpose: The aim of this study was retrospective assessment of the reduction quality, hospitalization time, and relief of pain in hematoma block assisted closed reduction versus sedoanalgesia assisted closed reduction. Materials and Methods: There were 106 patients included who diagnosed as isolated displaced distal fracture of radius and treated with closed reduction. Hematoma block was used in 45 patients and sedoanalgesia was used in 61 patients. Midazolam (0,1 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg) combination was administered as the sedoanalgesic agent, and lidocaine (10 ml, 1%) as the local anaestetic. Demographic data, fracture type according to Frykman classification, and mechanism of trauma were noted. Pain status of patients were recorded by using the Visual analog scale (VAS). Sarmiento criteria was used for the evaluation of the reduction quality. Cost of the analgesic procedure was assessed based on the prices of the analgesia procedures, used pharmaceuticals and medical consumables. Results: Both groups were similar in terms of gender, age, fracture type and affected side., Hospitalization time was shorter in hematoma block group, and VAS was significantly lower. Quality of reduction was similar in both groups. Cost per patient was four times higher in sedoanalgesia group compare to hematoma block group. Conclusion: Hematoma block is an effective, easily performed method that can be used prior to the closed reduction of the distal radius fractures to relieve the pain. Older patients can be susceptible to adverse effects of sedoanalgesia and hematoma block can be chosen as a more reliable method to provide the analgesia.

Keywords: