Özet:

In recent years, there has been a great deal of awareness among the people. But this sense should not remain a romantic enthusiasm for social scientists in particular; to learn Ottoman is just an element. The need to publish depending on the original topic and sources is increasingly feeling. The pleasure made by the imitation and transmission of existing publications is no longer being referred and not attracting attention in the international community. The program of social sciences went through the tracking of Western sources. The members of the Turkish universities referred to in the West will see that the great masters are among those who evaluate our own resources by modern scientific methods. Therefore, the work in all fields of social sciences must be coated with the knowledge of the main field by descending to our own historical sources. The article focuses on how people other than historians and literaries should follow and which works should be discussed. The methods on how much and from whom the Ottomanic is learned are among the subtitles of the article. In this regard, the economics, law, diplomacy, political sciences, philosophy, theology, sociology are emphasized by the examples of what the Ottoman language can earn. The most important need for this is terminology. Otherwise, the publications in these fields are made by historians with amateur curiosity and have deficiencies in nature. After all, it remains side by side as publications that do not have sufficient references and do not rely on methodological assessments. The whole article is basically opening a broader window to inter-disciplinary research in social sciences.