Abstract:

In this study, the relationship between university students’ psychological vulnerabilities, psychological well-being, social confidence and satisfaction levels was studied by gender variable. The study applied 3 scales, including "Psychological vulnerability scale", "Psychological well-being scale", "Social confidence and satisfaction level scale". According to the complementary post-hoc analysis techniques to determine which groups of significant differences are determined after ANOVA, a single-significant difference was found in the comparison of brother numbers in the scale of psychological vulnerability in 2 scales, and the result was that the difference between the groups in psychological well-being had a significant difference in the half of the scale and that there was no significant difference in the comparison of brother numbers in the rest of the groups. The post-hoc analysis determined after ANOVA, there is a significant difference in comparison of brothers and sisters according to the psychological well-being, there is a significant difference in all the remaining substances. ANOVA found that there was no significant difference in the remaining part in the social confidence and satisfaction scale between the groups determined by the number of brothers and sisters, but there was only a significant difference in 2 items. According to the post-hoc analysis of ANOVA, the social confidence and satisfaction levels are based on the number of brothers and sisters, and there is a significant difference in one item and there is no significant difference between the remaining substances. A RESEARCH OF THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG THE UNDERGRADUATES' PSYCHOLOGICAL VULNERABILITY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND SOCIAL TRUST AND SATISFACTION NEVELS ACCORDING TO THE NUMBER OF SIBLINGS Abstract In this study, some variables are analyzed in terms of the relationships among the undergraduates' psychological vulnerability, psychological well-being, social trust and satisfaction levels according to the gender variable. Three scales named such as "Psychological vulnerability scale", "Psychological well-being scale", "Social trust and satisfaction level scale" are applied in the framework of the study. As a result of the complementary post-hoc analysis techniques in order to determine which groups caused the significant difference after ANOVA, it is seen that there is only one meaningful difference in 2 scales in the comparison of the number of siblings in the psychological fragility scale. It is also concluded that there is a meaningful difference in the half of the scale between groups in ANOVA - Number of Siblings - psychological well-being. It is concluded that there is no meaningful difference for the number of siblings in the remaining groups. As a result of the post-hoc analysis determined after ANOVA, there is a meaningful difference in only 2 themes when comparing the number of siblings-psychological well-being criteria, a meaningless difference is emerged in all of the remaining themes. It is found that there is a meaningful difference in only 2 themes in the difference between the groups determined by the number of siblings in the ANOVA social trust and satisfaction scale and no significant difference in the rest of the themes anyway. As a result of the post-hoc analysis determined after ANOVA, it is discovered that there is a meaningful difference in one theme according to the number of siblings in the social trust and satisfaction level scale, and there is no meaningful difference between the remaining themes.

Keywords: