User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 16
 Downloands 3
Effect of different irrigation regimens on smear layer removal in human root dentin an invitro study
2017
Journal:  
Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences
Author:  
Abstract:

tion: Aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of 5% NaOCl with 17% EDTA, 18% Etidronic Acid, 9% Etidronic Acid and 0.2% Chitosan as different protocols of irrigating solutions for smear layer removal using scanning electron microscope. Methodology: Forty extracted human teeth were collected and stored in saline. Single rooted teeth with complete, mature root apices without any anatomic variation having straight patent root canal extracted for periodontal cause, were included in the present study. Teeth where then divided into four groups with 10 teeth in each group. Access opening followed by Bio-mechanical Preparation was done and teeth were irrigated as follows (n=10 per group).Group 1: 5% NaOCl during instrumentation, 17% EDTA after instrumentation (3min),Group 2: 5% NaOCl during instrumentation, 9% Etidronic acid after instrumentation (5min),Group 3: 5% NaOCl during instrumentation, 18% Etidronic acid after instrumentation (3min),Group 4: 5% NaOCl during instrumentation, 0.2% Chitosan solution after instrumentation (5min).After the irrigation of specimens longitudinal sectioning of specimens was done and subsequently smear layer removal ability will be evaluated.Results: All irrigants tested, removed smear layer effectively form the apical third. EDTA (Group 1) showed comparatively better results than 9% Etidronic Acid (Group 2), 18% Etidronic Acid (Group 3) and 0.2% Chitosan (Group 4) at the apical third. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between 17% EDTA, 9% Etidronic Acid, 18% Etidronic Acid, and 0.2% Chitosan in the ability to remove smear layer.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 1.419
Cite : 363
Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences