Özet:

Purpose: Traffic accidents can result in liability both in terms of criminal law and compensation law. In the assessment of permanent sections and the rates of property related to these sections, the specialists in judicial medicine have great tasks. In this investigation, we aimed at examining the court’s violation decisions on the property reports related to traffic accidents, assessing the facts to be taken into account. Tools and Methods: The legal legislation and the concepts of "travel accident" used in the calculations of the property ratio resulting from a traffic accident, used as the keyword, scaned the decisions obtained from the "Tribunal Decision Search Internet" address. In the court’s report on the property ratio related to a traffic accident, the reasons for violating the decisions taken in the first-degree courts were investigated. The Court of Justice 17. The 376 law enforcement department has been approved. According to the regulations/regulations not in force on the date of the unfair fact, the report was found to be the most frequent cause of disruption (n=262, 69.7 percent). This is, respectively, the fact that there are contradictory rates between the reports received, the fact that the regulations/regulations are not clear/ununderstood on which basis, the fact that there is an error in writing, the fact that the property report is not taken on the basis of the judgment and the fact that the issues related to the license link are followed. The conclusion is that the materiality reports must be underlying, reasonable and in accordance with the relevant legislation. Unregulated in accordance with the current legislation, unreasonably justified, not observed on the subject of the license bond, contradictory and uncontrollable reports may cause the loss of rights, the extension of the trial process.

Anahtar Kelimeler: