User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 25
 Downloands 4
Yağlı karaciğer hastalığının tanısında dual eko manyetik rezonans görüntüleme ile ultrasonografinin karşılaştırılması
2016
Journal:  
Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Fatty liver disease is a common cause of chronic liver disease affecting approximately one-third of the population. It is characterized by fatty infiltration of hepatocytes. It represents a spectrum of diseases including simple steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis and cirrhosis. Ultrasonography, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging can be used for the radiologic diagnosis of fatty liver. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of US and dual echo magnetic resonance imaging in detecting fatty liver.METHODS: Magnetic resonance images and ultrasound reports obtained in the same 30 days of 112 patients out of 179 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Chemical shift-based dual echo in-phase and out-of-phase images were compared to sonographic findings for the presence of hepatic steatosis, the degree of steatosis and the extend of liver involvement. Signal intensity differences in in- and out-of-phase images were calculated to quantify the fat fraction in the liver.RESULTS: Out of 112 patients, 55 and 62 were diagnosed with fatty liver with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. The difference between two radiologic techniques in detecting steatosis was not statistically significant (p=0839). However, the difference between ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging with respect to the degree of liver steatosis and heterogeneity of liver involvement were statistically significant (p=0.004 and p

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 948
Cite : 1.244
2023 Impact : 0.022
Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi