User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 7
Open source software adoption evaluation through feature level sentiment analysis using Twitter data
2016
Journal:  
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Author:  
Abstract:

Adopting open source software from the Internet, developers often encounter the problem of accessing the quality of candidate software. To efficiently adopt the system they need a sort of quality guarantee regarding software resources. To assist the developer in software adoption evaluation we have proposed a software adoption assessment approach based on user comments. In our proposed approach, we first collected the textual reviews regarding the software resource, assigned the sentiment polarity (positive or negative) to each comment, extracted the adoption aspect which the comment talks about, and then based on the adoption aspects of the software generated an aggregated sentiment profile of the software. Twitter micro-blogging data about OSS products were crawled, preprocessed, tagged, and then summarized. To evaluate the proposed model, a set of experiments was designed and conducted using different classifiers, i.e. Apriori, GSP, and AdaBoost. For the feature level sentiment summarization we have used Bayesian statistics and frequency distribution techniques. The results show that the proposed approach achieved satisfying precision and recall, i.e. above 80% along with an average accuracy of 70.98%.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science

Field :   Mühendislik

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 2.879
Cite : 1.405
2023 Impact : 0.016
Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science