User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 13
 Downloands 4
Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT) Experience of a Provincial Hospital in Eastern Turkey
2020
Journal:  
Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease
Author:  
Abstract:

Aim: Pilonidal sinus (PS) is an inflammatory disease of the sacrococcygeal region that negatively affects the life of the individual. Although there are many treatment modalities for the disease, a gold standard treatment method has not yet been determined. It was aimed to compare the endoscopic PS treatment method with other treatment methods in pediatric patients treated for PS in a second-line provincial hospital. Method: After obtaining approval from Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee with the decision number 2020/06-66, pediatric patients under 18 years of age who were operated for PS in Muş Provincial Hospital between January 2017 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were operated in the prone position, under spinal anesthesia by using total excision + primary closure, total excision + limberg flap, and endoscopic PS treatment (EPSIT) + phenol application methods. Patients’ age, gender, length of hospital stay, time to return to work or school, and minor and major complications were analyzed. Results: Forty eight patients in pediatric age group were included in the study. The average age of the patients was 16,18 years; 20 (41.6%) of the patients were male and 28 (58.3%) were female. The hospitalization period was 3,48 days and the average follow-up period was 480 days (16 months). Time to return to work was 10,6 (3-28) days. Forty eight patients underwent surgery. Limberg flap method was used in 13, primary closure method in 9 and EPSIT method in 26 patients. Six patients had recurrence, 5 patients developed minor complications such as seroma and necrotic fat tissue. The hospitalization period was 2 days and the time to return to work was 4.46 days in patients who underwent the EPSIT method, which was superior to the other two methods. The biggest disadvantage of the EPSIT method was the recurrence rate (n=4 patients, 15.3%). Conclusion: Although the recurrence rate of the EPSIT method with phenol application is high, it is more advantageous than other methods due to the short time to return to work or school and shorter hospital stay.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 649
Cite : 119
Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease