Özet:

Although the title of the book clearly reveals which Islamic philosophical tradition is meant, the analysis of the Meşâi philosophy is not a common choice. In addition, the author states that in the first lines of the Prejudice section, the distinction between the analytical philosophy and the continental European philosophy, which is already being treated in philosophy environments and has been generally accepted for a hundred years, is found unfounded. According to him, this distinction is based on a way of making philosophy and a number of social/ideological reasons, rather than the existence of a substantial distinction between the two traditions. Without entering the details of this surface difference, the author, one of the objectives in the book is the Islamic philosophy -B. As Russell does, it is to show to the contemporary 'analytic' philosophers that it is easy not to be easily ignored and that it can be regarded as much more 'analytic' than it is thought. and x).