User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 4
 Views 19
 Downloands 2
Reliability analysis of PISA 2018 reading literacy student questionnaire based on item response theory (IRT): Turkey sample
2022
Journal:  
International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction
Author:  
Abstract:

PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) tests have enabled the education systems of countries to see not only the success of their students in gaining the ability to solve the daily problems they may encounter in their lives but also the place in the world rankings as a result of an objective evaluation compared with the achievement results of other countries. Therefore, it is very important for the reliability and prestige of the program that the PISA exams and related student survey results are as unbiassed and error-free as possible. In this paper, validity and reliability study of the PISA 2018 Reading Literacy Student Survey (RLSS) Turkey sample was conducted including the analysis of survey items within the framework of Item Response Theory (IRT). The item fit indexes, item parameters according to the GPCM (Generalized Partial Credit Model), standard error values and item characteristics’ reliability of the survey were determined via IRT, respectively. The data set included the answers of 6111 15-year-old Turkish students participated in PISA 2018. In the data analysis, through using the local independence assumption, Q3 statistics; IRT calibrations were tested with the help of the “Mirt v.1.30” program within the scope of “R v.4.0.5”. In the study, each set of questions in the PISA student survey was examined independently from each other and each question set was considered as a separate attitude scale. The results showed that, although some of the items in PISA 2018 (RLSS) gave low level information, all the question sets in the test provided an acceptable model fit according to the GPCM. Upon examining the item characteristic curves, it was understood that the survey items showed valid and reliable results for testing different ability levels.

Keywords:

2022
Author:  
Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 666
Cite : 317
2023 Impact : 0.079
International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction