Abstract:

They are those who are witnesses to the revelation and who know his tongue. So they gained a good position in understanding the signs. And if they had understood the general purposes of the verses or the basic commandments and prohibitions of the religion, they had been translated into the sources with some verses about what they had to mean. The discourse of the Sabbath in the tribute has led some scientists and researchers to discourage the nature of this discourse. Therefore, there are two kinds of disputes in the form of the Tenevvuʿ(zahirî) and the Tezatî(s) in the form of the truth. The discrepancies and the concepts of Mescura are basically addressed by the multi-significance of the words or the contradiction of the meanings with each other. This is the cause of the uncertainty, which is the cause of the uncertainty, which is the cause of the uncertainty. Therefore, those who study the subject are also distinguished that in the Nazareth the interpretation of the Sahabe is the argument/true dispute. We think that the facts of conflict should be assessed by criteria such as God’s muracy, the perception of the interlocutor, the time and space unity, the consistency of the results in practice. And when they see the truth, they see the truth. For if they were a witness by their own signs, some reasons have brought them to dispute in the interpretation of the signs.