Atıf Sayısı
1
Görüntüleme
35
İndirme
8
Vadeli borçta peşin ödeme karışlığında indirim yapılmasının (الوضع والتعجيل) caiz olup olmayacağı meselesi çalışmamızın ana mevzudur. Cumhur söz konusu indirimi vadenin satın alınması olarak kabul etmiş ve bunu da cahiliye ribâsı çerçevesinde değerlendirerek haram kılmıştır. Bazı fakîhler ise böyle bir indirimi tarafların menfaati olarak düşünmüş ve meseleyi indirim sulhu (صلح الحطيطة) bağlamında değerlendirerek helal görmüşlerdir. Bu konudaki ihtilafların temel nedeni muteariz iki hadisin bulunmasıdır. Makalede erken ödeme indirimi muamelesinin şer‘î hükmüne ilişkin fukahânın yaklaşımları ortaya konulmuştur. Bu bağlamda konunun mahiyeti ile ilgili bilgi verildikten sonra söz konusu iki hadisin sened tahlili yapılarak konu açıklığa kavuşturulmaya çalışılmıştır. Ardından fakîhlerin görüşleri gerekçeleriyle birlikte değerlendirilerek tercihe şayan görüş tespit edilemeye gayret edilmiştir. Bu meyanda söz konusu muamelenin cahiliye ribâsı ile ilişkisinin olup olmadığı da belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır.
The question of whether or not we will be able to make a reduction in the amount of debt in the period is the main position of our work. The king accepted the discharge as the purchase of the valley, and it made it illegal in the framework of the ignorant ribs. Some of the poor, however, thought that such a discount was the benefit of the parties, and considered the issue in the context of the discount (peace) of the Hathaway (peace). The main reason for this conflict is the existence of two events. In the article, the approaches of the Fukahani on the treatment of early payment discount are revealed. In this context, after the information on the matter was given, the two hadits were tested and tried to make the matter clear. After that, the viewers of the poor were tried to be assessed together with the reasons for preferential viewing. This is the case for the investigation of whether it is related to the illness of the illness.
The matter about whether it is permissible that there is a discount in the time loan in exchange for the advance payment is our study’s main subject. The majority of scholars accepted the aforementioned discount as the purchase of term, and accepted it as unlawful by evaluating it within the scope of interest of jahiliyyah. Some jurists thought such discount as the benefit of parties and accepted the discount as halal by evaluating it in the context of discount magistrate. The main reason of disputes about this matter is that there are two opposite hadiths. The approaches of jurists were revealed about the canonical judgment of the transaction of early cash discount in the article. In this context, the information will be firstly given about the importance of this matter, and then the subject will be tried to be enlightened as the sanad criticism is made about the aforementioned hadiths. Then, an effort was made to determine a view worthy to be preferred as the views of jurists were evaluated with their legal reasoning. In this respect, it was tried to be determined about whether there is a relationship between the aforementioned transaction and the interest of jahiliyyah.
Alan : İlahiyat
Dergi Türü : Ulusal
Makale Detay 
Atıf Yapanlar
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
