User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 27
 Downloands 10
Nijerya’da Yoksullukla Mücadele Programı’na (NAPEP) İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme
2015
Journal:  
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Nijerya’da 2013 yılı itibarıyla yoksulluk sorunu çok önemli bir problem olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Öyle ki 112 milyon kişi, bir diğer ifadeyle nüfusun %70’i yoksulluk sınırının altında yaşamaktadır. Yoksulluk sorunu nerede olursa olsun barış, güvenlik ve refah olgularına karşı yöneltilen en önemli tehditlerden biridir. Bu bağlamda Nijerya hükümeti ülkedeki yüksek yoksulluk ve açlık problemine karşı bilinçli politikalar üretmektedir. Öte yandan Nijerya hükümetinin önlemlerine rağmen ülkedeki yoksulluk problemi azalmamakta tam tersine gün geçtikçe artmaktadır. Bu çalışma, Nijerya’daki yoksullukla mücadele programı NAPEP’i değerlendirmeye yöneliktir. Çalışmanın verilerinin toplanmasında, yapılan röportajlardan ve belgelerden yararlanılmıştır. Veriler tablolar, basit yüzdeler ve Sperman’ın sıralama korelasyonu kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bu çalışma, NAPEP programının Nijerya’daki yoksullukla mücadele sürecinde etkin sonuçlar sağlamaktan uzak olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç olarak programın yeniden oluşturulması ve yeniden değerlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.

Keywords:

An Assessment of the Programme to Combat Poverty in Nigeria (NAPEP)
2015
Author:  
Abstract:

As of 2013, the poverty issue in Nigeria has become a major issue. There are 112 million people, in other words, 70% of the population living below the poverty limit. Poverty is one of the major threats to peace, security and well-being, wherever it is. In this context, the government of Nigeria is developing conscious policies against the problem of high poverty and hunger in the country. On the other hand, despite the government’s measures, the poverty issue in the country is not reduced; on the contrary, it is increasing over and over the day. This study is aimed at evaluating the NAPEP programme for the fight against poverty in Nigeria. In the collection of the data of the study, interviews and documents were used. The data was analyzed using tables, simple percentages and the ranking correlation of Sperman. This study has shown that the NAPEP program is far from delivering effective results in the fight against poverty in Nigeria. The program needs to be re-established and re-evaluated.

Keywords:

An Assessment Of Poverty Eradication Programme (napep) In Nigeria
2015
Author:  
Abstract:

Poverty situation in Nigeria has become so serious that in 2013 there were as many as 112 million or 70.0% of the country’s population was living below poverty line. It has realized that poverty anywhere is a threat to peace, security and prosperity everywhere hence the conscious efforts by successive administrations in Nigeria to eradicate all forms of extreme poverty and hunger in a country. In spite of these efforts to eradicate absolute poverty in the country, poverty incidence has been on the rise. This study, therefore, attempted to assess NAPEP as a programme to eradicate extreme poverty in the country. Personal interviews and documents were employed in data collection. The data were analyzed using tables, simple percentages and spearman rank correlation. The study showed among others, that NAPEP as a programme targeted at eradicating extreme poverty has not been effective leading to a mixed bag of limited success and continuing challenges. It was therefore, recommended that the programme should be re-examined and possibly re-designed for effective performance instead of scrapping it.

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 423
Cite : 3.276
2023 Impact : 0.129
Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi