Abstract:

The Ottoman history printing, according to the establishment of the covenant, began in quite late dates. The texts of the centuries in which the first appearance of the Buddhism came up only about two centuries after the establishment of the Buddhism, and the historians have written their works with this understanding, even if they have not expressed in the history of centuries the idea that the elite of power should be at the center of history. The power has been an important element that has shaped the writing of history throughout history. The first examples of the Ottoman history of literature are the works that have appeared in this way. The most important historians of the classical era have taken the centers while explaining why they write their works. of XVI. At the end of the century, the scripture objectives of the works began to change, only the history considered to be the writing of the activities of the princes, XVI. From the end of the century, he began to change and enter the period of teaching or living the memories of others together with the kingdom. In the last quarter of the century, the classic period now depicted was the time when the powerful Ottoman padišahs began to take the place of the more silk padišahs and the influential persons in the bureaucracy came to the forefront, and the historical writing also changed, the traditional historical writing, i.e. the Gazi Padišah writing, was the time when other elites or ordinance began to be written. With the biographical works that began to be written during this period and the works that described the life and activities of a vesiriam, a vesiriam or a family that began to be seen later, Ottoman history has evolved and has increasingly begun to become the history of others. In the period that we can consider as the next stage, the Ottoman history has dominated a great deal of patronage, and accordingly historians have begun to write their works on the basis of fully personal interests such as managing, and/or getting to the state. During this period, in history printing, the intimate goals of the early period have become the fundamental determinant of the completely disappeared interest relationships.

Abstract:

Ottoman historiography started quite late by comparison with the foundation of the principality. The texts of the centuries when the principality first appeared only came about two centuries after the establishment of the principality, and historians wrote their works with this understanding even though they did not openly express the idea that the ruling elite should be the focus of history in centuries-old historiography. Power has been an important element shaping historiography throughout history. The first examples of Ottoman historiography are the works that also emerged in this way. When the most important historians of the classical period explained why they wrote their works they put the sultans in the center. However, towards the end of the sixteenth century, the purpose of writing began to change; the history, which was considered only as the writing down the activities of the Sultan, started to include lessons and the others’ memories of the Sultan at the end of sixteenth century. In the last quarter of the sixteenth century, there were changes in the historiography when less powerful sultans began to take the place of powerful Ottoman sultans of the classical period, and the influential people came to the forefront in the bureaucracy. So instead of traditional historiography, in other words Ghazi Sultan historiography, it became a term when other elites or ordinary people were written. In this period, the biographical works that started to be written and with works written later depicting the life and activities of a grand vizier, a vizier or a family, Ottoman historiography developed and gradually became the history of the others. In the period that can be considered as the next stage, the Ottoman historiography was dominated by patronage and the historians started to write their works based on purely personal interests such as spoils grabbing, good fortune and / or entering the service of state. In this period, the intimate aims of the early period historiography disappeared completely, and the relationship of interests became the main determinant in historiography.

Keywords: