Özet:

This study aims to reveal in the Turkish and Azerbaijani novels how the religious phenomenon and the religious typology are addressed with a viewpoint. In fact, the beginning of the twentieth centuryAzerbaijan and Turkish literature have many works that have been criticized by religious hurafes.As it is known, in Turkish literature, especially Reşat Nuri Güntekin, Halide Edip Adıvar, Sadri Etem, Reşat Enis Aygen, the criticism of religious men has been included in the works of writers such as Reşat Nuri Güntekin, Halide Edip Adıvar, Reşat Enis Aygen. In the Azerbaijani literature, Abdurrahim Mr. Hakverdiyev, Celil Memmedguluzade, Yusuf Vezir Çemenzeminligibi, the writers of this subject was obtained. One of the most important writers on this subject is Jacob Kadri Karaosmanoğlu and Ismael Şihli. Y. K. Karaosmanoğlu (1889-1974) is one of the famous writers of Turkish literature. The social-political events of the period reflected in their own own romances. The novel is one of the great works of the writer. Ismayil Şıhlı (1919-1995) is also one of the famous writers of Azerbaijan literature. He is known as a famous writer, journalist, screenwriter and researcher. Shehlı was the first secretary of the Azerbaijani Writers' Union between 1965 and 1968. In 1976-1978 he was the chief editor of the magazine "Azerbaijan" from 1981 to 1987 he was the president of the Azerbaijani Writers' Association. in 1984 he was awarded the honorary title of the Azerbaijani People and became a member of the Azerbaijani Parliament (1986, 1990). We can mention the names of Doctor's Tale (1947), Separated Roads (1957), Crazy Kur (1968), My Race (1975), Don't Lose Me (1984), Dead World (1992) etc. In the article, the two writers’ works discuss the religious fact. Comparative research method is used in the study. First, a general assessment on the subject was made in the context of Azerbaijan and Turkish literature, then the novel Deli Kür and NurBaba was studied by comparing themes and the subject. The research finds that both of them include not the criticism of the religious fact, but the criticism of the religious men who use religion for their own interests.