User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 11
 Downloands 3
Pharmacokinetics of Difloxacin in Probiotics-Treated Mycoplasma Gallisepticum Infected Chickens
2022
Journal:  
Acta Veterinaria Eurasia
Author:  
Abstract:

The impact of probiotics on difloxacin disposition in Mycoplasma gallisepticum-infected chickens after intravenous and oral administration (10 mg/kg) and its tissue residues after oral administration (10 mg/kg for 5 days) was studied. Difloxacin concentrations were estimated by the high-performance liquid chromatography method. Following intravenous administration of difloxacin, the volume of distribution in probiotic-pretreated Mycoplasma gallisepticum-infected chickens (4.05 ± 0.07) was less than that in non-treated birds (4.16 ± 0.07 mg/μg/mL). The t1/2β of difloxacin in probiotic-pretreated Mycoplasma gallisepticum-infected chickens (4.75 ± 0.09 hours) was significantly longer than that in the non-treated ones (4.55 ± 0.05 hours). The total body clearance of the drug from the plasma of probiotic-pretreated Mycoplasma gallisepticum-infected chickens (0.64 ± 0.00 mg/(μg/mL)/h) was less than that in non-treated ones (0.69 ± 0.01 mg/(μg/mL)/h). The area under the curve extrapolated to last plasma concentration0–t (15.20 ± 0.08 μg/mL/h) and the mean residence time (6.33 ± 0.11 hours) values in probiotic-pretreated Mycoplasma gallisepticum-infected chickens were larger than those in non-treated ones (14.13 ± 0.22 μg/mL/h and 6.02 ± 0.06 hours). The drug was rapidly absorbed orally in probiotic-pretreated Mycoplasma gallisepticum-infected chickens compared to non-treated ones (t1/2ab 1.47 ± 0.02 vs. 1.53 ± 0.05 hours). The peak serum concentration of difloxacin in probiotic-pretreated Mycoplasma gallisepticum-infected chickens was higher than that in non-treated ones (1.46 ± 0.07 vs. 1.18 ± 0.07 μg/mL) and was achieved at shorter time to peak concentration (2.59 ± 0.01 vs. 2.74 ± 0.05 hours). Residue levels of difloxacin were lower in probiotic- pretreated Mycoplasma gallisepticum-infected chickens than in non-treated ones in all examined tissues. Cite this article as: Mohamed, A., Hassan Atta, A., Darwish, A., & Mohamed, H. F. (2022). Pharmacokinetics of Difloxacin in Probiotics-Treated Mycoplasma Gallisepticum infected Chickens. Acta Veterinaria Eurasia. 48(2), 87-93.

Keywords:

2022
Author:  
0
2022
Author:  
Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Acta Veterinaria Eurasia

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 581
Cite : 252
2023 Impact : 0.017
Acta Veterinaria Eurasia