Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 5
 Görüntüleme 27
 İndirme 3
SEREBRAL PALSİLİ ÇOCUKLARDA GİLLETTE FONKSİYONEL YÜRÜME DEĞERLENDİRME ANKETİNİN GÖZLEMCİ İÇİ GÜVENİRLİK VE GEÇERLİĞİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI
2018
Dergi:  
Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi
Yazar:  
Özet:

Purpose: Gait is affected by sensorial and motor impairments in Cerebral Palsy (CP). Apropriate gait must be evaluated for improving and normalizing gait function during treatment. In this study, our purpose is to investigate the intrarater validity and reliability of the Gillette Functional Gait Assessment Questionaire (Gilette-FAQ) commonly used in clinically. Methods: 70 children between 5 and 18 years were included in this study. Gilette-FAQ was asked to family twice fifteen days interval for intrarater-reliability. Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) D and E sub-dimensions and pediatric functional independence measurement (WeeFIM) were used for construct validity and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) was used concurrent validity. Cronbach alpha (a) coefficient  was calculated. Alpha was accepted as enough between 0.70 and 0.95. Results: The mean age was 8.15±3.81 years. 72.9% of children was spastic,  20% was dyskinetic, 5.7 %  was ataxic and 1.4% was hypotonic type of CP.  Intra-class correlation (ICC) value was found 0.99 in test-retest reliability and internal consistency of Gilette-FAQ. There were positive strong correlations between Gilette-FAQ and GMFM-D, E (r=0.94, r=0.94, p<0.01); Gilette-FAQ and WeeFIM motor and total score (r=0.91, r=0.88, p<0.01). The results of one way ANOVA showed that Gilette-FAQ scores of GMFCS levels were different (p<0.05). Statistical difference was found between GMFCS levels in Post-hoc test (p<0.05). Conclusion: Gilette-FAQ was valid and reliable among the parents of children with CP for evaluating functional gait and determining rehabilitation results according to results.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Cerebral palsy in children assessment of functional behavior in the gland surveillance safety and effectiveness
2018
Yazar:  
Özet:

Purpose: Gait is affected by sensorial and motor impairments in cerebral palsy (CP). Appropriate gait must be evaluated for improving and normalizing gait function during treatment. In this study, our purpose is to investigate the intrarater validity and reliability of the Gillette Functional Gait Assessment Questionaire (Gilette-FAQ) commonly used in clinically. Methods: 70 children between 5 and 18 years were included in this study. Gilette-FAQ was asked to family twice fifteen days interval for intrarater-reliability. Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) D and E sub-dimensions and pediatric functional independence measurement (WeeFIM) were used for construct validity and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) was used concurrent validity. Cronbach alpha (a) coefficient was calculated. Alpha was accepted as enough between 0.70 and 0.95. Results: The average age was 8.15±3.81 years. 72.9% of children was spastic, 20% was discinetic, 5.7% was ataxic and 1.4% was hypotonic type of CP.  Intra-class correlation (ICC) value was found 0.99 in test-retest reliability and internal consistency of Gilette-FAQ. There were positive strong correlations between Gilette-FAQ and GMFM-D, E (r=0.94, r=0.94, p<0.01); Gilette-FAQ and WeeFIM engine and total score (r=0.91, r=0.88, p<0.01). The results of one way ANOVA showed that Gilette-FAQ scores of GMFCS levels were different (p<0.05). Statistical difference was found between GMFCS levels in Post-hoc test (p<0.05). Conclusion: Gilette-FAQ was valid and reliable among the parents of children with CP for evaluating functional gait and determining rehabilitation results according to results.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler










Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi

Alan :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

Metrikler
Makale : 264
Atıf : 239
2023 Impact/Etki : 0.041
Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi