User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 ASOS INDEKS
 Views 2
Use of Salicin-Rhamnose-Cellobiose-4-Methylumbelliferyl-b-D Glucuronide–Sorbitol MacConkey (SRC-MUG-SMAC) Differential Agar for the Presumptive Identification of Escherichia coli O157 from the Primary Isolation Step
2005
Journal:  
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences
Author:  
Abstract:

A differential agar for the further detection of presumptive Escherichia coli O157 strains among typical sorbitol negative and cefixime-tellurite resistant strains was investigated. For this purpose, in parallel to colonies of 8 reference strains, 1130 suspect colonies picked from the surface of cefixime-tellurite (CT)-sorbitol MacConkey (SMAC) (CT-SMAC) agar plates of food samples (white cheese, raw milk and ground beef) were transferred to differential agar plates. After a 6-h incubation period at 42 ºC, only 47 (4.15%) of the 1130 colonies appeared as typical E. coli O157 on the differential agar plates (100 x 15 mm) gridded into 25 numbered sections. Salicin (S), rhamnose (R) and cellobiose (C) were tested separately and together in combination with MUG. The best results were obtained from the combined use of the 3 in SMAC medium (SRC-MUG-SMAC). When violet red bile lactose agar (VL) was used in the same manner as SRC-MUG-SMAC, only 16 (1.41%) of the 1130 colonies remained typical. In this procedure, no biochemical test was required for further identification. The use of an SRC-MUG-SMAC plate immediately after the colony selection step appeared to be more discriminative than the addition of these sugars and MUG to the primary isolation media. As a result, the testing of presumptive E. coli O157 colonies using a differential agar plate including MUG and 3 (or more) sugars that are not fermented by this organism is a rapid, easy, precise and relatively inexpensive isolation procedure, and it is particularly ideal for use in routine screening laboratories.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles








Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

Journal Type :   other

Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences