User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 18
 Downloands 5
Resistance patterns and trends of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: 5-year experience
2013
Journal:  
Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) strains were emerged when multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) was inadequately treated. Inadequate treatment of MDR-TB cases may result in additional resistance especially non-XDR-TB and then XDR-TB. The aim of this study was to know the prevalence, resistance patterns and trends of the XDR-TB strains among the MDR-TB at a tertiary care hospital in Lucknow, India Methods: A total of 430 Mycobacterium isolates were underwent NAP test and TB MPT64 Ag test for the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC). Drug-susceptibility test (DST) was performed over MTBC for the first line drugs by 1% proportion method (Bactec) and for the second-line drugs by 1% proportion method (Lowenstein-Jensen media). The XDR-TB status was further confirmed by line probe assay (GenoType® MTBDRsl assay). Results: Among the 430 isolates of mycobacterium, 365 (84.9%) were MTBC and 139 (38.1%) were MDR-TB respectively. Further 97 MDR-TB from "highly suspected drug resistant-TB (DR-TB)" cases among MDR-TB were tested with second line drugs in which 15 (15.5%) XDR-TB and 82 (84.5%) were non-XDR-TB. Regarding XDR-TB status, using the 1% proportion method a 100% agreement was seen with the GenoType® MTBDRsl assay. Resistance patterns of XDR-TB were as; 10/15 (66.7%) as isoniazid + rifampicin + ciprofloxacin + amikacin resistance and 5/15 (33.3%) as isoniazid + rifampicin + ciprofloxacin + amikacin + kanamycin resistance. Conclusion: The prevalence of XDR-TB was 15.5% among MDR-TB. Hence laboratory testing of "highly suspected drug resistant-TB" isolates should be done for both first and second line drugs simultaneously especially in developing countries.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 450
Cite : 96
Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases