User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
A COMPARATIVE FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF REGULAR AND TOPOLOGICALLY OPTIMISED DENTAL IMPLANTS FOR MECHANICAL AND FATIGUE RESPONSES EVALUATION
2023
Journal:  
IIUM Engineering Journal
Author:  
Abstract:

Abstract Topology optimisation is a prominent method to improve the performance of any systems by optimising geometrical factors to save materials without compromising the system functionality. Currently, there is limited published data discussing the topologically optimised dental implants that makes the matter still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical and fatigue behaviours of regular and topologically optimised dental implant designs using 3-D FEA. Geometrical models were developed in accordance with ISO 14801 using SolidWorks 2020 before being analysed in ANSYS 18.1. The new implant design was created by topology optimisation analysis. The material properties of all parts were assumed to be isotropic, linearly elastic, and homogenous. Nine different compressive load values ranging from 100 to 500 N were applied on the loading structure as separated cases. The vertical and bottom surfaces of the holder were fully constrained. The results showed that the topologically optimised implant recorded about 12.3% lower implant stress than the regular implant. Both implant designs revealed a comparable displacement result with a percentage difference of only 2.3%. The optimised design was also found to produce longer fatigue life and approximately 12.3% higher safety factor compared to the regular design. The increase in the compressive load value has increased the stress and deformation, whilst decreased the fatigue life and safety factor in both designs. Although it was estimated that the volume of the new implant could be reduced to about 24% of the traditional one, the implant functionality may still be retained or even be improved.

Keywords:

0
2023
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles












IIUM Engineering Journal

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

IIUM Engineering Journal