Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 ASOS INDEKS
 Görüntüleme 3
Comparative study of ropivacaine (0.5%) versus levobupivacaine (0.5%) as regional anesthesia in gynecological surgeries: A tertiary care hospital based study at Eastern India
2021
Dergi:  
International Journal of Health and Clinical Research
Yazar:  
Özet:

Introduction: Most women experience moderate to severe pain during labor and delivery, often requiring some form of pharmacologic analgesia. The lack of proper psychological preparation combined with fear and anxiety can greatly enhance the patient’s sensitivity to pain and further add to the discomfort during labor and delivery. However, skillfully conducted obstetric analgesia, in addition to relieving pain and anxiety, may benefit the mother in many other ways. The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the block induced by ropivacaine (0.5%) plain and levobupivacaine (0.5%) plain in gynecological surgeries at the recommended dose range. These concentrations have provided equivalent block after epidural analgesia. Material and methods: This randomized, prospective, double blind study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Department of Anesthesia and Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Haldia, West Bengal between Jan 2019-December 2019. Fifty patients who were posted for gynecological surgeries were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: Group R received 3.5 ml (17.5 mg) 0.5% ropivacaine plain and Group L received 3.5 ml (17.5 mg) 0.5% levobupivacaine plain. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block and any undesirable side effects were noted. Results: The mean sensory block onset time in levobupivacaine group was 6.23 ± 1.13 min, while it was 7.89 ± 2.74 min in ropivacaine group. The mean sensory onset time was higher in ropivacaine as compared to levobupivacaine group (P = 0.0073). The mean duration of sensory block in levobupivacaine group was 265.87 ± 79.67 min, while it was 239.89 ± 61.18 min in ropivacaine group. The mean duration of sensory block was higher in levobupivacaine group in comparison to ropivacaine group (P = 0.2021, NS). The mean motor block onset in levobupivacaine group was 5.29 ± 2.23 min, while it was 6.78 ± 2.67 min in ropivacaine group. The mean motor onset time was higher in ropivacaine group in comparison to levobupivacaine group (P = 0.0373). The mean duration of motor block in levobupivacaine group was 248.33 ± 78.18 min, while it was 209.29 ± 53.16 min in ropivacaine group. The mean duration of motor block was higher in levobupivacaine group in comparison to ropivacaine group (P = 0.0373). Conclusion: The mean duration of sensory block was higher in levobupivacaine group in comparison to ropivacaine group (P = 0.2021, NS). The mean motor onset time was higher in ropivacaine group in comparison to levobupivacaine group (P = 0.0373). The mean duration of motor block was higher in levobupivacaine group in comparison to ropivacaine group (P = 0.0373).

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler










International Journal of Health and Clinical Research

Dergi Türü :   Uluslararası

International Journal of Health and Clinical Research