User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 8
 Downloands 2
EFFICACY OF HYDRALAZINE IN COMPARISON WITH LABETALOL FOR CONTROL OF SEVERE HYPERTENSION IN PATIENTS WITH ECLAMPSIA
2020
Journal:  
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective: To compare the efficacy of intravenous hydralazine with intravenous labetalol for control of severe hypertension in eclamptic patients. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Obstetrics and Gynecology unit “B”, PGMI Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar, from Mar 2017 to Sep 2017. Methodology: Total 206 patients were included in this comparative study. They were randomly divided into two groups; group A and group B, each group comprising of 103 patients. The group A was given 5mg hydralazine as an initial intravenous bolus. After 20 minutes blood pressure was measured and if systolic and diastolic blood pressures were found to be >160 mmHg and>110mmHg respectively, the same dose was repeated maximally 3 times. The group B received 20mg labetalol as an initial intravenous bolus, then after every 20 minutes followed by 80mg to a maximum of three doses if systolic and diastolic blood pressures persisted >160 mmHg and >110mmHg respectively. Results: Mean age in group A was 27 ± 2.93 years whereas in group B mean age was 29 ± 3.18 years. Moreover, blood pressure was effectively lowered in 92% patients of group A and in 90% patients of group B. There was no statistically significant difference found between the efficacies of the two drugs. Conclusion: It was found that efficacy of the two drugs is similar in lowering blood pressure in eclamptic patients.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 2.236
Cite : 131
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal