Views
47
Downloands
15
Siyasal aktörlerin seçim dönemlerindeki söylemlerinin değerler açısından incelendiği bu araştırmada, seçmenin beklentilerine karşılık vermek amacıyla söylemlerde hangi değerlere atıf yapıldığı incelenmiştir. Siyasal aktörlerin 3 Kasım 2002, 22 Temmuz 2007 ve 12 Haziran 2011 seçim dönemlerinde seçmeni ikna etmek için hangi beklenti ve değerlere seslendikleri, siyasetin değişen ve değişmeyen değer öncelikleri ve bunlar sonucunda Türkiye siyasetinin değer önceliklerine göre sıralanmış hiyerarşik değer sistemi belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. 2000 sonrası Türkiye siyasetinin önemli ve değişmeyen aktörleri olarak AKP, CHP ve MHP’li siyasal aktörlerin bahsedilen seçim dönemlerinde gazetelere yansıyan söylemleri incelenmiştir. Schwartz Değer Ölçeği’nde yer alan değerlerin analiz kategorileri olarak kullanıldığı bir nitel içerik analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda incelenen üç seçim döneminde üç siyasi partinin temsilcilerinin de en fazla atıf yaptıkları ilk dört değerin, sırası değişmekle birlikte, aynı olduğu saptanmıştır. Türkiye siyasetinde sıradan politik kültürün ortak iyisini temsil eden bu değerlerin başarılı olmak, kendi amaçlarını belirlemek, sorumluluk sahibi olmak ve dürüstlük olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Türkiye’de siyasal söylemin ortak bir siyasal popüler kültürden beslendiği ve kazanan ya da kaybeden parti farkı olmaksızın benzer değerlere yaslanan söylemlerle seçmenin ikna edilmeye çalışıldığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
Due to the determinability of politics in social power relations, the number of research aimed at understanding and explaining political preferences and voter behavior is rapidly increasing. One of the studies on political behavior in which each field is addressed by its own perspective is the studies aimed at explaining the influence of individual expectations and values on political preferences. This study focuses on the relationship between politics and value in its essence is one of them. This study, which examines the values of political actors in the election period, examines what values are referred to in the statements in order to meet the expectations of the voter. To reveal this, the political actors were trying to determine what expectations and values they called to convince the voter during the elections of 3 November 2002, 22 July 2007 and 12 June 2011, the policy’s changing and unchanging values priorities and, as a result, the hierarchical values system classified according to the values priorities of the Turkish policy. In this context, as important and unchanging actors of the Turkish politics after 2000, the political actors of the AKP, CHP and MHP have been examined the statements reflected to the newspapers during the referred election period. A quality content analysis has been carried out where the values contained in the Schwartz Value Scale are used as analysis categories. The analysis found that the first four values that the representatives of the three political parties repeatedly referred to in the three election periods, while the order changed, were the same. These values, which represent the common good of the ordinary political culture in the Turkish politics, have been established to be successful, to determine their own goals, to be responsible and to be honest. From here the move has come to the conclusion that the political speech in Turkey is fed from a common political popular culture and that the party winner or loser is trying to convince the election with the speech that lies to similar values without any difference.
This study that focuses on the relationship between politics and value is one of these. In this survey, in which discourses of political actors in election terms were examined in terms of values it was examined which values were referred to in discourses in order to respond to the expectations of the electorate. It was tried to determine which expectations and values political actors refer to convince electorate during elections of 3 November 2002, 22 July 2007, 12 June 2011, changed and unchanged value priorities of politics and hierarchical value system which is ranked according to the value priorities of Turkish politics. In this context as being important and unchanged actors of Turkish politics after 2000, discourses of political actors in AKP, CHP and MHP are examined during election periods. A qualitative content analysis was conducted in which values in the Schwartz Value Scale were used as analysis categories. As the result of the analysis the first four values that representatives of three political parties in three elections refer, are same although rank is changed. In Turkish politics it was determined that these four values are to be successful, to determine your own aims, to have responsibility and to be honest. We found that political discourse in Turkey is fed from a common political poplar culture and it is tried to be persuaded by the discourses that are based on similar values.
Field : Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
