Özet:

Turkey is one of the countries that often encounter natural disasters due to its geological-topographic structure and climate characteristics that lead to large losses of lives and goods. The statistics of structural damage caused by natural disasters over the past six decades have shown that 62% of the damage was caused by earthquakes. As a result of the destruction or serious damage of many houses after the disaster, the families living in these houses are faced with the need to be quickly resettled. In Turkey, when it comes to approaches related to the disaster residence problem; a) Emergency aid phase b) Rehabilitation phase c) Reconstruction phase the problem is treated in three stages. In Turkey, the three-stage accommodation approach applied after a catastrophe; when examined in the 6 different earthquake examples; in the three stages there is no specific strategy, the decision of the path to be followed is left after a catastrophe and this lack prevents preparation to catastrophe. In addition, this three-stage post-catastropic accommodation approach is gradually, inadvertently, insufficient to meet the needs of the catastrophes and to efficiently use the country’s resources. It is possible to gather the problems in subtitles such as administrative-legal, location-setting, design-application and use of units, infrastructure, socio-psychological, cost and sustainability. As a result of the problem solving, it is necessary to address the post-catastropic housing problem with all the interactive components as a system, to create decision-making steps that each region can follow by placing its own data in a pre-catastropic system and to use the country’s resources efficiently and to design a sustainable housing system for urgent solution.

Anahtar Kelimeler: