Özet:

In Uzbek grammar, the subject of syntax is dealt with in two basic parts: "word groups" and "sentences". However, one of the most important problems in Uzbek grammars is the neglect of the subject of "sentence". This subject was generally included in the works of Russian Turcologists at the beginning of the 19th century, but the information given was adapted not according to Turkish rules, but according to the grammatical features of Russian. Accordingly, although a full syntactic harmony is expected in Uzbek and Turkey Turkish, which are the dialects of the same language, some differences have occurred at the point of classification. In both dialects, the sentence is classified in terms of structure and different definitions and approaches are given regarding the concept of "compound sentence". It is also noteworthy that the differences of opinion we encountered in Turkey Turkish in this issue are quite limited in Uzbek. The "subordinate sentence", which is expressed with the term ergash gap in Uzbek grammars, forms sub-types of qo'shma gap, that is, "combined sentence", considering its syntactic function, content and connection styles. Compound sentence in Uzbek is given as two main titles as bo'glangan qo'shma gap (connected compound sentence) and ergash gapli qo'shma gap (compound sentence with subordinate clause). Ergash gapli qo'shma gap is also grouped within itself according to the subordinate clauses that are subject to the main clause. The "subordinate clause", which is the main subject of our study, also stands out with its relationship with word groups and its sequence features in compound sentences. According to some Uzbek linguists, although it is similar to word groups, it has differences according to its organizational forms and functions in sentences. Subordinate sentences, which do not express independent judgment and complete the main sentence from various aspects, are grouped under 14 headings in Uzbek in terms of declaring the subject, predicate, object, adverb, measure and degree, place, time, condition, purpose, comparison, indicator, obstacle, reason and result in the sentence. Classifications, which are made by taking into account the way the subordinate clauses are connected to the main sentence and the connecting elements (prepositions, prepositions, and sentence-binding auxiliary words), appear as a commonly accepted classification in Uzbek grammar. These subordinate clauses, which were classified in our study, were examined on the basis of their types and uses and tried to be explained together with the case of subordinate clauses in Turkey Turkish.

Anahtar Kelimeler: