User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 ASOS INDEKS
  Citation Number 1
 Views 4
Our experiences with spinal anesthesia in pediatric patients
2011
Journal:  
AĞRI
Author:  
Abstract:

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of spinal anesthesia, including its efficacy, adverse effects and complications, in order to determine if it can be applied safely in pediatric patients at high-risk for general anesthesia. We emphasize our positive outcomes in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery in our previous experience. Methods: The perioperative data of 86 pediatric patients who received spinal anesthesia between 2007 and 2008 were scanned retrospectively. Demographic data, operation types, anesthetic applications, duration of surgery, motor blockade degree, two dermatomes regression time, postoperative analgesic requirements, adverse effects, and complications were recorded. Results: The operation time and two dermatomes regression times were found as 49.8±24.1 minutes and 73.0±21.9 minutes, respectively. At the end of the operation, motor blockade had disappeared in 17 patients and persisted in 68 patients. Block time was measured as 67.3±16.2 minutes in these patients. During the intraoperative period, hypotension was observed in two patients, and bradycardia occurred in one patient. Except for these, hemodynamic parameters did not change more than 20% from control values at any time. In three children, surgery was continued under general anesthesia. Forty-six patients required additional analgesic doses in the postoperative period. The time to first analgesic requirement was 2.3±1.2 hours. During the postoperative period, no hemodynamic or respiratory complications were observed. Conclusion: Spinal anesthesia continues to gain acceptance as an alternative to general anesthesia in children. However, we conclude that accumulated experience is required in order to apply this technique safely in pediatric patients. We emphasize the positive outcomes, adverse events and complications observed in our experience.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










AĞRI

Field :   Sağlık Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 171
Cite : 5
AĞRI