User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 61
 Views 17
Hemşirelerin iş yaşamı kalitesi ve etkileyen faktörlerin belirlenmesi
2015
Journal:  
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences
Author:  
Abstract:

Objective:  This study was conducted as a descriptive study and aimed to determine nurses’ quality of work life (QWL) and the influencing factors. Method:  The study was conducted with 310 nurses working at nine private hospitals and three training and research hospitals in Istanbul between March and June 2013. Data were collected with the “Nurses Data Sheet” containing the socio-demographic characteristics of nurses and with the “Quality of Nursing Work Life Scale” (QNWL). The percentage, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD, Student t, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U test and chi-squared tests were used to assess data.  Results:  The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of nurses in QNWL was found to be 0.89 and the mean score of the scale was determined to be at a good level (110.35±19.35). The mean score of QNWL of the nurses working at private hospitals was at a good level (115.12±19.12) whereas it was found to be at a medium level (105.12±18.12) at training and research hospitals. The highest QNWL subscale score of nurses was obtained in “work conception” subscale with a score of 3.50±0.65 at training and research hospitals and 3.68±0.63 at private hospitals. On the other hand, the lowest score was obtained in “working environment” subscale (2.59±0.78) at training and research hospitals and in “working conditions” subscale (3.02±0.50) at private hospitals. It has been determined that age group and educational status, which are among the descriptive characteristics of nurses, and the institution they work, monthly salary, professional working period and working period at the institution, weekly working hours, the presence of workflow chart, the presence of career aims at the institution, choosing the profession willingly, the desire to leave the institution, participation in the decisions taken and the fairness of nurse managers to nurses, which are among the professional characteristics, affected the QNWL subscales and there were statistically significant difference between them (p<0.05). Conclusion:  The QWL of nurses in general and of the nurses working at private hospitals was determined to be at a good level, whereas the QWL of nurses working at training and research hospitals was at a medium level. It is suggested to conduct required activities by the health care institution managers so as to improve work life conditions of the nurses working at training and research hospitals in particular and to support the nurses in order to improve their QWL.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles






Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 949
Cite : 1.426
2023 Impact : 0.046
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences